What was Arthur Conan Doyle's writing process for Sherlock Holmes stories?

The Strand published Holmes as a monthly story that had to stand on its own, and the shape of the work follows from that constraint: one client, one room, one absence, one reversal, at a length a reader finishes in a sitting. Read the finished stories backwards and you can see what had to exist first. The solution came before the scenes, because the clues sit too well to have been found while drafting. Whether Doyle outlined on paper is the unhelpful question. The useful one is what the finished stories require, and they require a fixed answer, a marked line of evidence, and only then the ordinary business that covers it.

How did Arthur Conan Doyle structure his mystery plots to feel fair?

Fairness in Doyle is a matter of availability. The decisive fact stands on the page in plain words, and three things strip it of importance at once: the company it keeps, a narrator who fails to weight it, and a competing explanation that fits everything you have seen so far. Look at how much of "The Hound of the Baskervilles" is spent on true information leading nowhere. The convict is real. The signalling is real. Neither has anything to do with the hound. When the reader is finally corrected he can trace the answer back through sentences he read and accepted, and that audit trail is why he blames his attention rather than the author.

How does Arthur Conan Doyle create suspense without constant action scenes?

By pressure of information rather than danger. The reader is kept a little behind the detective and a little ahead of the narrator, and that position itches. Doyle's tensest scenes are often two men sitting in the dark waiting for something the story has refused to describe in advance, which works because the reader has enough context to expect something and not enough to name it. That is the mirror image of what Highsmith does, where you know precisely what is coming and cannot look away. Doyle also breaks sections off short of resolution, so his compressed passages feel fast and his held ones feel unbearable. None of it needs violence.

What can writers learn from Arthur Conan Doyle's use of Watson as narrator?

Watson is a job description. Doyle proved that by giving the same job to somebody else: "The Lost World" is narrated by a young journalist standing at the same distance from Professor Challenger that Watson stands from Holmes. The two late stories Holmes narrates himself are the control experiment. They are competently made and oddly flat, because the gap between seeing and understanding has closed and there is nowhere for the reader to stand. So pick a narrator who can witness everything the reader needs and interpret none of it yet, and then hold that line even when it costs you a scene you wanted to write.

How do you write like Arthur Conan Doyle without copying his Victorian voice?

Strip the period out and see whether the machine still runs. Take one of your scenes, swap the hansom for a bus and the telegram for a message, and check whether the case still turns on where the facts sit. If it does, the vocabulary was decoration and you can write in whatever English you speak. What has to survive the swap is the ordering: the fact disclosed early and quietly, the harmless explanation offered beside it, the narrator's confident misreading, and the late scene that rereads a sentence you already own. Doyle's diction dates. His information hygiene does not.

Why are Arthur Conan Doyle's deductions satisfying even when readers don't solve them?

Because the pleasure on offer is correction. Doyle lets you build a reasonable model of the case, then shows you the one assumption that bent it, and you finish reading better than you started. He also ties the answer to physical detail you have already handled, so the ending feels like a second reading rather than a late arrival. There is a further pleasure that gets less credit, which is watching a method run at full speed with nothing hidden. Holmes pacing out the length of an elm's shadow in "The Musgrave Ritual" is withholding nothing from you. You are watching arithmetic beat an old family riddle, and it is enjoyable the way a good demonstration is enjoyable.

Fiction

Arthur Conan DoyleWriting Style

Born 5/22/1859 – Died 7/7/1930

Let a trustworthy narrator state everything except the one fact that matters. Being fooled starts to feel like fair play.

Write like Arthur Conan Doyle

Writing Style Overview

Writing style overview of Arthur Conan Doyle: voice, themes, and technique.

A dog lay in the stable that night, and the dog did not bark. That absence is the whole case in "Silver Blaze". Doyle's evidence is often not a thing but a hole where a thing should be, and once you have noticed the habit you find it all through him: the single dumbbell without its pair in "The Valley of Fear", the seven Bruce-Partington papers in a dead man's pocket when the file had held ten. This is hard to do. The absent fact has to be reported plainly enough that the reader takes delivery of it, and buried in enough ordinary furniture to escape being weighed, and those two requirements pull in opposite directions in every sentence that has to carry one.

Watson is the instrument. His job is not admiration. He observes accurately, he reasons, and he arrives at a conclusion that is wrong in exactly the way an intelligent reader's conclusion would be wrong. Hand him Dr Mortimer's walking stick at the start of "The Hound of the Baskervilles" and he produces a careful, plausible, mistaken portrait of its owner. Sensation reaches the page before meaning does, which is the delay Conrad worked with Marlow, arrived at from the other end of the literary market.

Doyle also had a structural nerve his imitators rarely copy. When the motive for the Lauriston Gardens murder needed a long American backstory, he stopped "A Study in Scarlet" dead in the middle, left London, dropped Watson entirely, and told the second half in another voice. The Dartmoor chapters of "The Hound of the Baskervilles" hand narration over to Watson's letters and his diary, dated and filed, because a man writing reports cannot know how the story ends.

What survives is the contract. Chandler spent an essay attacking the puzzle school for turning murder into a crossword, and he was right about its worst products, but the promise underneath is still the reason anyone opens a mystery at all. I have hidden nothing from you, only from your attention. Read Doyle for that promise being kept, sentence by sentence, and you will see where he pays for it.

How to Write Like Arthur Conan Doyle

Writing techniques and exercises to emulate Arthur Conan Doyle.

1
Write down the things that are not there
Before you draft a scene, list the absences your case runs on. A dog that stayed quiet. A pair of dumbbells with one gone. A ticket that should have been in a pocket. An absence is harder to hide than an object and worth more when it lands, because the reader cannot dismiss it as a detail he skimmed, so he blames his own reading rather than your withholding. Write each one as flat reporting inside a longer stretch of ordinary observation. No adverb of surprise. No sentence that stops to admire it.
2
Give the narrator a wrong theory, not a blank
Let your viewpoint character reason his way to a conclusion, and make it the conclusion a sharp reader would reach. Watson studies Dr Mortimer's stick, works methodically, gets the profession roughly right and the particulars wrong. That is the shape you want. A narrator with no theory of his own leaves the reader nothing to be corrected out of, and the ending then has to arrive as news instead of as a correction. Draft his theory in full. Give it a page. Break one leg of it two scenes later and leave the rest standing.
3
Describe the mechanism before it works
Take whatever your solution physically depends on and put it on the page as furniture, early, in daylight, in a paragraph about something else. Doyle hands you the Grimpen Mire in "The Hound of the Baskervilles" as landscape, a bog that swallows a moor pony while Stapleton talks about butterflies, and the same bog is later a kennel and a grave. The rule is that the description must be accurate and complete and must not be framed as odd. Write that a detail was strange or oddly placed and you have converted evidence into a signal, and the reader will file it as a clue instead of as a room.
4
Spend the method on something worthless first
Run your specialist's technique once on an object that does not matter. Holmes reads Watson's brother off a pocket watch in "The Sign of the Four", off the pawnbroker's numbers scratched inside the case and the marks around the winding hole, and none of it touches the plot. It is calibration. The reader learns which kinds of inference are legal in this world from a demonstration that costs nothing, and he extends the same credit later where everything is at stake. Skip the step and every deduction in the case reads as authorial fiat.
5
End on an ambush, not an explanation
The famous image is a detective explaining everything to a seated audience. Doyle's better endings do not work that way. In "The Red-Headed League" the trap closes in a dark cellar while the reader is still down there in the dark with it, and the account of what happened arrives afterwards, as tidying. Write the catch as a scene with physical stakes, then let understanding lag a page or two behind it. Your reader gets the shock first and the sense of it second, and that is the order in which being fooled feels fair.

Arthur Conan Doyle's Writing Style

Breakdown of Arthur Conan Doyle's writing style: sentence structure, tone, pacing, and dialogue.

Sentence Structure

Two grammars share the page. Watson narrates in long subordinated periods, a clause laid on a clause, the way a careful man writes up an evening afterwards. Holmes speaks in short flat chains: an observation, the thing that follows from it, a full stop. The full stops do the arguing. Each step is made to look separately checkable. You can hear the switch in "The Red-Headed League", where Watson gives you the pawnbroker's assistant and Holmes gives you the knees of the man's trousers. Doyle also likes the inventory sentence, a run of objects with no verb of judgment anywhere in it, and that is where he hides things. Copy the two registers and leave the Victorian commas.

Vocabulary Complexity

Doyle trained as a doctor, and his technical vocabulary is load-bearing rather than decorative. He names the particular substance, the particular instrument, the particular trade word: the beeswing in a wine glass, the cataract knife in a dead trainer's hand, the swamp adder kept in a bedroom safe. None of it is there for atmosphere. Each one narrows the field of people who could have done the thing, because only some people own a cataract knife. Between those hard words he keeps the connective tissue plain, so a page of Doyle rarely asks you to work at a sentence, only at what the sentence contained. His narrator is careful with hedges too. Phrases like "it seemed" and "I could not but think" mark the places where Watson is interpreting rather than seeing, and a reader who learns to spot them is being trained to distrust the right paragraphs.

Tone

Order leaves the room and comes back into it. Every case returns to the same sitting room, the same fire, the same tobacco and index volumes and violin, and that repetition is the tonal engine: a reader who knows the furniture will follow you anywhere. Watch the register. It barely lifts when the worst thing happens. The hound on the moor gets reported in the same measured voice as the breakfast, and it lands harder for it, because the voice has not started performing. There is a moral temperature under the calm as well. Crime is disorder and method is the answer to it, which is a comfortable proposition, and the stories decline to apologise for it. Imitate the flatness and skip the fog.

Pacing

Weeks vanish in a clause, and then a man sitting in the dark gets a page to himself. That ratio is the whole of Doyle's pacing. He compresses travel, waiting and routine questioning into summary, then stops the clock at the threshold: the first lie, the first measurement, the moment before a door opens. The Dartmoor section of "The Hound of the Baskervilles" is the largest instance and an unusually patient one, because Watson is stranded on the moor filing reports while nothing resolves, and the reader's discomfort is built out of that stalling rather than out of any event. Scene ends carry the load. Doyle likes to close on a contradiction or on an object still short of an explanation, so the reader leaves each section holding something.

Dialogue Style

Most of these stories open with a stranger talking for several pages without interruption. Helen Stoner, Jabez Wilson, Mary Morstan: the client arrives, sits down, and delivers the case in her own words, with her own emphases and her own gaps. Doyle gets three things out of that, an exposition dump that is dramatised, a witness whose distortions are on the record, and a reader who has heard the facts before anyone interprets them. Then the questions start. Holmes interrogates less to extract information than to make a person commit to a version, because a version can be broken later and a silence cannot. Watson's questions belong to the reader, and they tend to be the right question asked one beat early. When somebody in Doyle sounds courteous and evasive at the same time, that is design and not manners.

Descriptive Approach

Look at the bedroom in "The Adventure of the Speckled Band". A bell-pull that rings nothing, a bed clamped to the floor, a ventilator opening into the next room instead of the outside air: on first reading, the description of a shabby badly renovated room in a decaying house. On second reading it is a murder weapon, fully assembled, described in advance and in daylight. That is the standard Doyle sets for description. It is a high one. Setting arrives as usable fact, with distances and sightlines and the condition of objects, and with enough atmosphere to put the body in a real place. The selection is Watson's, which is what keeps it fair. He records what a competent observer would record and skips what a specialist would extract, so the room is complete and unread at once.

Signature Writing Techniques

Signature writing techniques Arthur Conan Doyle uses across their work.

The absent item

Build the decisive evidence out of something missing rather than something present. One dumbbell in "The Valley of Fear" with no partner. Seven papers on a dead man when the file held ten. The move handles fairness better than any planted clue does, because an absence is fully disclosed the moment it is named and still slides past most first readings, and no reader can claim afterwards that you concealed it. The cost is planning. You have to know the solution before you can know what its shadow looks like, so for most writers this is a second-draft tool.

The client's uninterrupted account

The case usually arrives in a stranger's voice, at length, badly organised. Its advantage over a briefing scene is that the facts come inside a person, with her emphases, her omissions and her own theory of what happened, so evidence and bias reach the reader in one package. It also front-loads the entire case, which is what allows a short story to be fair at all. The difficulty is patience. Several pages of one voice will die unless the account keeps colliding with whatever the speaker is trying not to say.

The trivial demonstration

Run the method once on something that costs nothing. A pocket watch, a battered hat brought in with a Christmas goose, a walking stick a visitor left behind. What the reader is learning is which kind of inference is legal in this world, and having watched the method work with nothing at stake he will extend it credit when everything is. Get this wrong and the detective's later work looks like the author knowing the answer, which is the single fastest way to lose a mystery reader.

Arithmetic the reader can check

Numbers in Doyle are checkable. In "Silver Blaze" Holmes works out the speed of the train by timing telegraph posts against his watch, mid-conversation, for no reason except that you should know this world obeys arithmetic. Clock times, distances, departures. A reader who believes the numbers are honest will accept an inference he has no way of verifying. The trap is the museum tour. Every measurement has to close a door, or it is furniture with a decimal point on it.

The document read aloud

Hand a character a piece of physical text and make them read it out. The Baskerville manuscript, a scorched fragment of a letter recovered from a grate, a line of dancing stick figures. A document read on the page carries an authority no summary has, it can be quoted back at the end without the reader feeling led there, and it puts the whole room in the reader's own position. Stoker built a whole novel on that effect. A document sits still. That is the risk, and it is why Doyle keeps a listener in the room to interrupt the reading.

The recorded defeat

Holmes loses on the record, and the loss stays in print. Irene Adler beats him in "A Scandal in Bohemia" and he keeps her photograph. In "The Adventure of the Yellow Face" his whole theory of the case is wrong, and he asks Watson to whisper "Norbury" in his ear the next time he sounds too sure of himself. Two things come from paying that price. The detective stops being an oracle, and every later success reads as earned rather than granted. It only works if the failure is real, because a defeat the detective planned is not a defeat.

Literary Devices Arthur Conan Doyle Uses

Literary devices that define Arthur Conan Doyle's style.

The published account as a frame

Watson's writings exist inside the fiction. Holmes has read them and complains about them, telling Watson that detection ought to be a science and that he has tinged it with romance, and the complaint does structural work, because it speaks the objection a suspicious reader is forming and disarms it by saying it first. The frame licenses summary, since a report may skip a fortnight. It licenses omission, since a man writing up a case need not print everything. And it sets an expectation of order, because reports end with findings, which buys Doyle enormous patience in the middle. Take the frame away and you get something closer to Hammett, whose narrator reports the same way and declines to say what he has worked out.

The strongest wrong explanation

A red herring in Doyle is rarely noise. It is a coherent theory that accounts for most of what you have seen, offered at the moment you most want an account of it. "The Hound of the Baskervilles" gives you an escaped convict on the moor, a servant signalling from a window at night, and a stranger following Sir Henry in a cab. All three are real, all three get explained, and none of them is the answer. The reader commits. That is the mechanism. Once you have adopted an explanation you have staked something on it, so the correction reaches you as a reversal rather than as information.

Delayed decoding

Doyle shows the action and holds back the translation. Holmes taps the pavement outside a pawnbroker's shop with his stick, and what you watch is a man doing something eccentric for no stated reason, and the reason turns up later when the cellar under that shop proves to run towards a bank vault. A boot goes missing from Sir Henry's hotel room in London, and the theft stays a puzzle for chapters before it becomes a scent trail. Events keep moving while meaning stalls, which is the only way to delay without slowing down, and it spares Doyle from writing Holmes thinking on the page, which would give the game away in a paragraph.

Recognition by re-filing a detail

His best reveals do not add a fact. They move one across a category line. A stain stops being mess and becomes a signature. In the hall at Baskerville Hall, Holmes holds his arm across a portrait's hat and hair, and a seventeenth-century Baskerville face turns into Stapleton's, which converts an heirloom into a motive and a family tree into a suspect list. Nothing new entered the room. What changed was the file the detail sat in, and the reader who walked past that portrait pays for it with exactly the pleasure Doyle is selling.

Imitation Mistakes

Common imitation mistakes when copying Arthur Conan Doyle.

Writing the absence as though it were interesting

The negative fact is Doyle's best tool and the easiest one to ruin. Written as "strangely, the dog had not made a sound", it stops being evidence and becomes a nudge, and the reader files it under things to remember for later. Doyle's version is flatter than that and survives because it is boring on arrival. What has gone wrong underneath is mistrust of the reader: the writer fears the detail will be missed, so he marks it, and the marking destroys the effect he was trying to protect. Let it be missed. Being missed is the point, and the reader's own memory will hand it back when you need it.

Turning the companion into a question mark

The standard imitation gives the narrator nothing to do but ask what the detective is thinking. That empties the position. Watson is worth having because he reasons wrongly, in public, at length, which hands the reader a theory to lose and hands the reveal something to correct, and that exchange of a theory given away and then taken back is the transaction the form runs on. A narrator who only asks questions leaves the reader with nothing invested, so the ending can do no more than inform him. Check what your viewpoint character believes as each scene closes. If the answer is nothing, you have a camera where a mind should be.

Copying the drawing-room explanation

Pastiche reaches for the detective explaining at the end, because that is the image the adaptations left behind. The stronger Doyle endings put the capture first: a vigil in a dark room, a hand on a lantern, and only then an account of what happened and why. The reason is physical rather than intellectual. Explanation before action gives you a scene in which the reader knows the outcome and waits for the paperwork, whereas explanation after action gives him the correction while his pulse is still up. If your last chapter is nothing but speech, move the arrest into it.

Buying the surface instead of the placement

Gaslight, hansoms, fog, formal address, a certain stiffness in the sentences: it is all detachable, and none of it is the craft. Doyle's signature is where the fact sits. Which sentence carries it, what ordinary business surrounds it, which harmless explanation comes in the same breath, and how many pages pass before anyone picks it up again. A writer who reproduces the period instead of the placement produces a costume, and the costume gives itself away, because the prose slows down at the exact points where Doyle's speeds up. You can write a Doyle story in flat modern English on a commuter train. It will hold, if the information moves the way his does.

Books

Explore Arthur Conan Doyle's books and discover the stories that shaped their writing style and voice.

The Hound of the Baskervilles
The Hound of the Baskervilles

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Arthur Conan Doyle's writing style and techniques.

What was Arthur Conan Doyle's writing process for Sherlock Holmes stories?: The Strand published Holmes as a monthly story that had to stand on its own, and the shape of the work follows from that constraint: one client, one room, one absence, one reversal, at a length a reader finishes in a sitting. Read the finished stories backwards and you can see what had to exist first. The solution came before the scenes, because the clues sit too well to have been found while drafting. Whether Doyle outlined on paper is the unhelpful question. The useful one is what the finished stories require, and they require a fixed answer, a marked line of evidence, and only then the ordinary business that covers it.
How did Arthur Conan Doyle structure his mystery plots to feel fair?: Fairness in Doyle is a matter of availability. The decisive fact stands on the page in plain words, and three things strip it of importance at once: the company it keeps, a narrator who fails to weight it, and a competing explanation that fits everything you have seen so far. Look at how much of "The Hound of the Baskervilles" is spent on true information leading nowhere. The convict is real. The signalling is real. Neither has anything to do with the hound. When the reader is finally corrected he can trace the answer back through sentences he read and accepted, and that audit trail is why he blames his attention rather than the author.
How does Arthur Conan Doyle create suspense without constant action scenes?: By pressure of information rather than danger. The reader is kept a little behind the detective and a little ahead of the narrator, and that position itches. Doyle's tensest scenes are often two men sitting in the dark waiting for something the story has refused to describe in advance, which works because the reader has enough context to expect something and not enough to name it. That is the mirror image of what Highsmith does, where you know precisely what is coming and cannot look away. Doyle also breaks sections off short of resolution, so his compressed passages feel fast and his held ones feel unbearable. None of it needs violence.
What can writers learn from Arthur Conan Doyle's use of Watson as narrator?: Watson is a job description. Doyle proved that by giving the same job to somebody else: "The Lost World" is narrated by a young journalist standing at the same distance from Professor Challenger that Watson stands from Holmes. The two late stories Holmes narrates himself are the control experiment. They are competently made and oddly flat, because the gap between seeing and understanding has closed and there is nowhere for the reader to stand. So pick a narrator who can witness everything the reader needs and interpret none of it yet, and then hold that line even when it costs you a scene you wanted to write.
How do you write like Arthur Conan Doyle without copying his Victorian voice?: Strip the period out and see whether the machine still runs. Take one of your scenes, swap the hansom for a bus and the telegram for a message, and check whether the case still turns on where the facts sit. If it does, the vocabulary was decoration and you can write in whatever English you speak. What has to survive the swap is the ordering: the fact disclosed early and quietly, the harmless explanation offered beside it, the narrator's confident misreading, and the late scene that rereads a sentence you already own. Doyle's diction dates. His information hygiene does not.
Why are Arthur Conan Doyle's deductions satisfying even when readers don't solve them?: Because the pleasure on offer is correction. Doyle lets you build a reasonable model of the case, then shows you the one assumption that bent it, and you finish reading better than you started. He also ties the answer to physical detail you have already handled, so the ending feels like a second reading rather than a late arrival. There is a further pleasure that gets less credit, which is watching a method run at full speed with nothing hidden. Holmes pacing out the length of an elm's shadow in "The Musgrave Ritual" is withholding nothing from you. You are watching arithmetic beat an old family riddle, and it is enjoyable the way a good demonstration is enjoyable.

Ready to improve your draft with direction?

Open Draftly, bring your draft, and move from stuck to a stronger draft without losing your voice. Editors are on standby when you want a deeper pass.

Fix My Draft

Free welcome credits included. No credit card needed.