What makes Doris Kearns Goodwin's history read like a novel?

Cast, crucible, and the order she puts things in. She assembles a group competing for a single prize, finds the reason they cannot walk away from each other, and holds outcomes back until the participants themselves had them, which is enough to keep a reader moving through material whose ending sits in every textbook. Novelists get those three effects from invention. Goodwin gets them from selection, which is the harder route and the reason her books read as trustworthy while still reading fast.

How does Doris Kearns Goodwin build suspense when the outcome is known?

By restoring what the participants did not know. The result of the 1860 convention is settled history, and the hours before the last ballot were not settled for anybody inside them, so she writes those hours and lets the result arrive on the schedule the telegraph set. Two habits carry it. She releases news at the speed it traveled, and she spends her longest passages on the moments when somebody's position changed rather than on the moments a summary would call important. The reader's anxiety moves off the result and onto the price.

Which Doris Kearns Goodwin book should a writer study first?

Team of Rivals, for structure. Its opening chapter is the cleanest demonstration of the simultaneous cross-cut in her work, and the book as a whole is a controlled experiment in keeping defeated rivals on stage. Read No Ordinary Time second, for scene. It goes closer to private life than her other political books, and it shows what a domestic detail can measure that a policy paragraph cannot. The Bully Pulpit comes third, and it is the one to study if your subject involves a press, a public, or any audience whose opinion belongs to the plot. Read the memoir last, and read it for method rather than for the baseball.

Does her method work on subjects smaller than a president?

Yes, and the requirements do not change. You need a set of people who want one thing, a reason they are stuck with each other, and a record detailed enough to place them in rooms on particular days. A school board, a hospital ward, or a family firm supplies the first two. What does not scale down is the archive. Goodwin can write an afternoon because somebody kept the letters, and a subject that left no paper puts you in interviews instead. That moves the craft problem from selection to extraction and makes the want column more useful, not less.

What did Doris Kearns Goodwin's research process look like?

Immersion, then a brutal reduction. She reads the letters, diaries, and newspapers of a period until she can place her people on ordinary days, and the writing problem that follows is discarding nearly all of it. Two of her books had a source who could answer back. Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream came out of the years she spent around Johnson after his presidency. He talked at her for hours at the ranch, and she wrote down afterwards what she could remember. An Unfinished Love Story came out of the boxes her husband had carried since the Kennedy years, opened with him while he was alive to argue about what was inside. The transferable part is the order. Collect until the ordinary days are visible, decide what the story is proving, and then throw out the material that proves something else.

Is her style worth copying if you write fiction?

The structural half transfers and the sourcing half does not apply. A novelist can invent the letter Goodwin had to find, which removes her hardest constraint along with the thing that disciplines her selection, so the useful transfer is the shape rather than the method. Take the crucible and the hinge day. Both belonged to fiction first, and watching a historian apply them under a rule that forbids invention is a fast way to see what they do. Leave the archive discipline to the nonfiction writers and steal the cast list.

Non fiction

Doris Kearns GoodwinWriting Style

Born 1/4/1943

Pick scenes for what a person wanted rather than for what occurred. History stops reading like a list of dates.

Write like Doris Kearns Goodwin

Writing Style Overview

Writing style overview of Doris Kearns Goodwin: voice, themes, and technique.

Four men waited for a telegram. Team of Rivals opens on the day the Republican convention voted in Chicago, and Goodwin puts her reader in four rooms at once: William Seward at home in Auburn, Salmon Chase in Columbus, Edward Bates in Missouri, and Abraham Lincoln moving between a law office and a telegraph office in Springfield, each of them with an evening already planned. Three of them lost. All three took jobs in the winner's cabinet.

Her real subject is people who want the same thing and cannot leave the building. Sol Stein gave the arrangement a name, the crucible, and pointed at No Ordinary Time as his example: Franklin Roosevelt turning a country into an arsenal, Eleanor Roosevelt pressing him about refugees and sharecroppers and Black defense workers, the two of them tied to one house by one emergency and to each other by a marriage that had become a partnership decades earlier. Neither could leave. Pressure, not sequence, moves her chapters.

She learned the move as a child. Wait Till Next Year describes the scorebook she kept through Brooklyn Dodgers games so that she could give her father the whole afternoon, inning by inning, when he got home from work, and that scorebook explains her books better than any label for them does: he often knew the score before she started, so the only thing she had left to give him was the order in which it happened.

Writers who imitate her copy the warmth and skip the discipline. What reads on her pages as generosity is a run of hard cuts: two years pushed into a clause so a single afternoon can hold a chapter, a famous speech summarized in a line while a household letter gets quoted twice, a rival's recorded contempt for Lincoln left standing because deleting it would make the later reconciliation free. Read her for what is missing.

How to Write Like Doris Kearns Goodwin

Writing techniques and exercises to emulate Doris Kearns Goodwin.

1
Put a want beside each name
Before you outline, write the cast down one side of a page and, beside each name, the thing that person is trying to get. Stein's advice for nonfiction is to find the want and move it forward, because a fact that thwarts somebody's desire lands differently from the same fact reported cold. Do this for the minor figures too. Goodwin can hold a whole cabinet in a reader's head because each member arrives attached to one legible appetite. A name with nothing beside it is context, and context belongs in a clause.
2
Find out what keeps them in the room
A rivalry with an exit is an anecdote. Look for the thing that makes leaving expensive: an office nobody can resign from, a shared household, a shared payroll, a war that will not wait. Stein called it the crucible and noticed that biographers stumble into it without naming it, which is why so many well-researched books lose their grip in the second half. Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt could not separate, and No Ordinary Time draws its pressure from that fact more than from the fighting overseas. Write the exit cost down in one sentence before you draft, and if the sentence will not come, ask yourself whether you have a subject.
3
Open on one day
Pick the day your material turns. Write it at full length, with the clock running. Goodwin gives her first chapter to the hours in which four men learned whether they had won a nomination. What a reader needs about the 1850s arrives later, in pieces, once there is somebody to worry about. Chronology can wait. A reader will absorb an enormous quantity of background from a writer who has already handed them a person at risk, and hardly any from a writer who has not.
4
Cut the quotation to the line that moves something
Go through your best document and mark the one sentence that changes somebody's position, and quote only that. Paraphrase the approach and the sign-off, and leave the speaker's grammar as you found it, because a tidied sentence reads as invented and a clumsy one reads as true. Stein learned this editing Jimmy Hoffa, whose bad grammar was the most convincing thing on the page and whose cleaned-up version was dead on arrival. Six words of Lincoln inside Goodwin's own sentence carry more than a paragraph of Lincoln standing alone, and they cost the narration nothing in speed.
5
Tell it to somebody who knows the score
Take a chapter whose ending your reader already knows and tell it out loud to a friend who also knows the ending. Watch where they stop listening. Those are the places where you have been summarizing an outcome instead of restaging a decision, and the repair is to go back to what the participants knew that morning, which is a smaller and far more interesting set of facts. Goodwin ran that exercise nightly as a girl, with a scorebook and a father who often knew the result already. Suspense in history has little to do with the result. It is about the price and the route.

Doris Kearns Goodwin's Writing Style

Breakdown of Doris Kearns Goodwin's writing style: sentence structure, tone, pacing, and dialogue.

Sentence Structure

Her long sentences carry several people at once. A characteristic one names two or three figures, gives each of them a place and an action. It holds its point until the final clause, so the syntax does the cross-cutting that a film editor gets from a splice. Then she stops. The sentence after it runs six words and delivers the finding. The pairing recurs through Team of Rivals: a paragraph of maneuvering by Chase or Seward, closed by a short flat clause about what Lincoln did with it. Semicolons carry most of her joining, and she reaches for a colon whenever the back half of a sentence is the evidence for the front half. Accumulate, accumulate, stop.

Vocabulary Complexity

Count the abstract nouns on a Goodwin page. You will not find many, because her working vocabulary is the job's: caucus, patronage, dispatch, ward, telegram, cabinet, memorandum. Period words stay, glossed in the same breath, which is how The Bully Pulpit gets a reader who has not met the word muckraker into an editorial meeting at McClure's without pausing to define anything. Feelings get plain names. Ambition, envy, grief, exhaustion, vanity: ordinary words, made to carry weight because she pins each one to a documented act instead of to an adjective. The verbs are the tell. Her people press, stall, withhold, concede, sulk, leak, and wait, and each of those verbs is a claim about behavior that a citation can carry.

Tone

Does she like her subjects? Plainly, and she keeps printing the material that makes liking them harder. Chase works against the president who appointed him for most of Team of Rivals, courting delegates from inside the Treasury. Goodwin lets that run the length of the book without softening it and without turning him into a villain. He is a gifted administrator with a hole where proportion should be. The Bully Pulpit is harder. She admires Roosevelt and Taft equally, and she declines to settle their quarrel, which leaves a reader holding a grievance with two legitimate sides and no permission to pick one. Warmth here is a byproduct of attention rather than of approval. She notices what a man eats when he is losing.

Pacing

Time in her books is distributed unevenly, and the unevenness is the argument. An afternoon in which nothing is decided can take a paragraph. An afternoon in which a man changes his mind can take a chapter. No Ordinary Time compresses months of production quotas into brisk summary and then slows to the hour for a scene upstairs in the White House, because that is where the cost of the schedule shows on the man keeping it. Watch her section endings. They tend to stop on an open question about who now holds the advantage, which is an old serial-fiction trick and works on documented material for the reason it works on invented material. She also refuses to hurry a known result. The reader knows the convention nominates Lincoln, so she spends her length on the ballots before the one that settled it, on the overnight bargaining in the hotels, on the crowd that had gathered at Seward's house in Auburn to celebrate a nomination that did not come.

Dialogue Style

Almost nothing in a Goodwin book is set as a block quotation. She runs the quoted words into her own sentence, usually a fragment of six or eight words, so the voice arrives inside her syntax instead of interrupting it. That choice costs the drama of a full transcript and buys speed. Sol Stein's rule for nonfiction is that anything past three sentences has become a speech, and Goodwin behaves as though she agrees: when a letter has to run long, she breaks it with a line about the weather that day, or what the recipient did next, or who else was in the room. The other half of her practice is refusal. She does not write thoughts she cannot source, so where the record goes quiet she moves the sentence back to behavior, and a reader feels the gap as tact instead of as a hole. Diaries and letters do the interior work. Eleanor Roosevelt's own writing carries her side of No Ordinary Time, which is how the book can go that close to a marriage without inventing a line of it.

Descriptive Approach

No Ordinary Time begins with a man trying to fall asleep. Roosevelt puts himself on a sled at Hyde Park, a boy going down a hill in snow. The ritual works because for the length of it he is not aware of the legs under the sheet. The method is visible in that one paragraph, and she picks physical detail that measures something no document states outright. Rooms get described by who controls them. Weather appears when it is making somebody's day worse. Illness gets attention out of proportion to its medical interest, because illness is where a political calendar meets a body that cannot keep up, and Nellie Taft's stroke in the first months of her husband's presidency costs him the one adviser who could manage him. Furniture is mostly absent, and Goodwin spends a sentence on a desk when somebody is standing behind it, deciding.

Signature Writing Techniques

Signature writing techniques Doris Kearns Goodwin uses across their work.

The Hinge-Day Budget

Pick the days before you draft. Goodwin's books run on a small number of fully staged days, and everything else is bridge, which means the allocation decision comes before the writing rather than during it. A day earns full treatment when somebody's position changes inside it. Nothing else qualifies, however good the anecdote, and the discipline hurts because the material you cut is usually the material you enjoyed finding. The bridges then have one job: carry a reader from hinge to hinge with the fewest new names, and let the compression itself signal that nothing here changed anybody's mind.

The Second Cast

The Bully Pulpit has two casts. Roosevelt and Taft occupy one, and the McClure's writers occupy the other: Ida Tarbell taking apart Standard Oil, Ray Stannard Baker, Lincoln Steffens, and a publisher whose enthusiasms kept outrunning his finances. The journalists are not there for atmosphere. They let Goodwin show a president being read, which is harder and more interesting than showing a president acting, and it converts public opinion from an abstraction into a room with named people arguing in it. A subject with a press, a board, or a congregation has a second cast available.

The Damaging Document Left In

Stanton had treated Lincoln with open contempt during a patent case in Cincinnati, and Goodwin puts that episode on the page before Stanton becomes Secretary of War. Seward, newly installed at the State Department, sent the president a memorandum proposing that he take direction of the administration himself, and that goes in too. Both documents make her subject look weak. Both make his recovery mean something, because a reconciliation between men who disagreed politely is an anecdote, while a reconciliation between men who insulted each other in writing is a plot. The rule underneath is worth having: the worse the evidence you print, the more a reader will accept the conclusion you draw from it.

Rivals Kept on Stage

Most political narratives retire the losers. Goodwin keeps them. Seward, Chase, and Bates all lose the nomination in the opening chapter and then work for the man who beat them from that point to the last page, and Chase goes on maneuvering against Lincoln until Lincoln makes him Chief Justice. The appointment looks like generosity. It also reads like calculation, and the ambiguity is what a reader chews on for the rest of the book. Keeping a defeated rival in the story costs pages and buys a second line of tension that runs the whole way, so the book does not depend on the next external event for its energy.

The Re-entry Tag

A figure returns after a long absence with a tag attached. Three or four words do it: the office he holds, the town he answers to, the grievance he is still carrying. Goodwin repeats these tags without embarrassment, which is why a cast the size of a cabinet stays legible over a long book. Writers trained on fiction resist the repetition, because it feels like a failure of invention. In a book with dozens of named people and no cast list at the front, the repetition is the courtesy that keeps a reader from flipping backwards, and the cost of skipping it is a reader who quietly stops caring which senator this is.

The Baseline Day

Before the crisis, the routine. No Ordinary Time spends real length on who slept where in the White House, who came to dinner, when the mail arrived, and which members of the household could get into the study without knocking. None of that is decoration. The routine is the instrument that lets a reader register a departure from it, and a book that skips the step has to announce that a day was unusual instead of letting the day show it. Establishing a baseline costs you a slow early chapter, and the return arrives whenever you can make a point by reporting that somebody was not at breakfast.

Literary Devices Doris Kearns Goodwin Uses

Literary devices that define Doris Kearns Goodwin's style.

The Simultaneous Opening

Four locations, one hour, four men waiting for the same news. Goodwin uses the cross-cut at the start of Team of Rivals and returns to the shape whenever a decision is being made in more than one place, and it does two jobs: it introduces a crowded cast in a form a reader can hold, and it turns a foregone result into a wait. The alternative would be a chapter each. Sequential portraits deliver the same information and lose the simultaneity, which is the part that makes a reader feel the odds. Somebody watching three men prepare to celebrate cannot help calculating what the fourth is about to do to them. The device has a cost she accepts. It front-loads names, and a reader who stops early will not keep them straight.

Communicating Vessels

Vargas Llosa's term for a braid is communicating vessels: two lines of action set beside each other so that each changes the meaning of the other. His test is the one to steal. Proximity alone does nothing, and two threads that make no contact are two articles printed in alternating chapters. His model is the agricultural fair in Madame Bovary, where the prize-giving below is cruel on its own and the seduction upstairs is sentimental on its own, and interleaved, neither reads that way. The braid in No Ordinary Time holds for the same reason, since Eleanor's campaigns and Franklin's calculations keep colliding inside one household on the same evenings.

Quotation Set Inside the Sentence

She rarely gives a document the floor. Six words of a letter turn up inside a clause of her own, framed by what the writer wanted and followed by what changed, so archival material moves at the speed of her narration. Compare the usual practice. A block quotation asks a reader to do the analysis, and readers skim it, which means the writer has handed over the most demanding part of the job at the exact moment the evidence arrives. Goodwin pays for her method with an obligation. Because she is choosing the fragment, she has to be visibly fair elsewhere, and she buys that credit by quoting the lines that argue against her reading of a man.

The Withheld Verdict

Events in Team of Rivals reach the page at the moment the participants learned of them. News comes by telegram, and the delay between an event and the reaction to it is preserved instead of collapsed, so a reader who knows how the election went still spends the evening in Springfield not knowing. This is sequencing rather than mystery-mongering. She has no interest in pretending the outcome is unsettled, and every interest in restoring the hours when it was. The technique fails in one situation. Where the participants themselves already knew the result, the delay is fake, and readers feel the manipulation at once, which is why she saves the device for moments the record shows as uncertain.

Imitation Mistakes

Common imitation mistakes when copying Doris Kearns Goodwin.

Assembling a large cast without giving anyone a want

The group portrait is the standard failure of Goodwin imitation. A writer collects an interesting circle, gives each member a paragraph of background, and expects the arrangement to produce the pull that Team of Rivals has, when the pull in that book comes from four people wanting one job that only one of them can hold. Ask the test question of your own cast. If two of your figures traded places tomorrow, would anything in the story change? When the answer is no, you have a panel discussion rather than a rivalry, and no amount of scene-setting repairs it, because the problem sits in the selection of people and not in the prose.

Alternating two storylines that do not touch

Cross-cutting looks easy and hides a hard requirement, because alternation without exchange is two books in one binding. The reader learns to skip one thread, usually the one with less shouting in it, and by the middle of the book the structure has become a liability. Write down what thread A does to the reading of thread B before you commit to the braid. If the answer is that it supplies contrast, keep going. If the answer is that it supplies variety, you have a scheduling device rather than a structure.

Quoting at length to prove you did the reading

Long quotation feels like rigor and reads like abdication. Goodwin's restraint here is the part imitators skip, because cutting a document you spent a week finding is painful and printing it whole feels like respect for the source. It is not respect. A reader who meets a full page of nineteenth-century prose skims it, and the analytical work has been handed to the person least equipped to do it. Keep the sentence that changed something, paraphrase the rest, and where the wording itself is the event, say so before you quote. The test is whether the phrasing or the information is what matters.

Filling the silences with what the person must have felt

The record runs out often, and the temptation is to write the feeling anyway. Goodwin's answer is to move down a level, from what a man felt to what he did with his afternoon, and to let a reader perform the inference she has declined to publish. That reads as depth. It is also the version that survives a hostile reader, since an unsourced interior sentence is the first thing a reviewer with a grudge quotes back at you, and one of them puts every other claim in the book under suspicion. The habit to build is small. When you catch yourself writing that somebody felt something, ask what document you would produce if challenged, and if the answer is a shrug, write the behavior and stop.

Books

Explore Doris Kearns Goodwin's books and discover the stories that shaped their writing style and voice.

Team of Rivals
Team of Rivals

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Doris Kearns Goodwin's writing style and techniques.

What makes Doris Kearns Goodwin's history read like a novel?: Cast, crucible, and the order she puts things in. She assembles a group competing for a single prize, finds the reason they cannot walk away from each other, and holds outcomes back until the participants themselves had them, which is enough to keep a reader moving through material whose ending sits in every textbook. Novelists get those three effects from invention. Goodwin gets them from selection, which is the harder route and the reason her books read as trustworthy while still reading fast.
How does Doris Kearns Goodwin build suspense when the outcome is known?: By restoring what the participants did not know. The result of the 1860 convention is settled history, and the hours before the last ballot were not settled for anybody inside them, so she writes those hours and lets the result arrive on the schedule the telegraph set. Two habits carry it. She releases news at the speed it traveled, and she spends her longest passages on the moments when somebody's position changed rather than on the moments a summary would call important. The reader's anxiety moves off the result and onto the price.
Which Doris Kearns Goodwin book should a writer study first?: Team of Rivals, for structure. Its opening chapter is the cleanest demonstration of the simultaneous cross-cut in her work, and the book as a whole is a controlled experiment in keeping defeated rivals on stage. Read No Ordinary Time second, for scene. It goes closer to private life than her other political books, and it shows what a domestic detail can measure that a policy paragraph cannot. The Bully Pulpit comes third, and it is the one to study if your subject involves a press, a public, or any audience whose opinion belongs to the plot. Read the memoir last, and read it for method rather than for the baseball.
Does her method work on subjects smaller than a president?: Yes, and the requirements do not change. You need a set of people who want one thing, a reason they are stuck with each other, and a record detailed enough to place them in rooms on particular days. A school board, a hospital ward, or a family firm supplies the first two. What does not scale down is the archive. Goodwin can write an afternoon because somebody kept the letters, and a subject that left no paper puts you in interviews instead. That moves the craft problem from selection to extraction and makes the want column more useful, not less.
What did Doris Kearns Goodwin's research process look like?: Immersion, then a brutal reduction. She reads the letters, diaries, and newspapers of a period until she can place her people on ordinary days, and the writing problem that follows is discarding nearly all of it. Two of her books had a source who could answer back. Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream came out of the years she spent around Johnson after his presidency. He talked at her for hours at the ranch, and she wrote down afterwards what she could remember. An Unfinished Love Story came out of the boxes her husband had carried since the Kennedy years, opened with him while he was alive to argue about what was inside. The transferable part is the order. Collect until the ordinary days are visible, decide what the story is proving, and then throw out the material that proves something else.
Is her style worth copying if you write fiction?: The structural half transfers and the sourcing half does not apply. A novelist can invent the letter Goodwin had to find, which removes her hardest constraint along with the thing that disciplines her selection, so the useful transfer is the shape rather than the method. Take the crucible and the hinge day. Both belonged to fiction first, and watching a historian apply them under a rule that forbids invention is a fast way to see what they do. Leave the archive discipline to the nonfiction writers and steal the cast list.

Ready to improve your draft with direction?

Open Draftly, bring your draft, and move from stuck to a stronger draft without losing your voice. Editors are on standby when you want a deeper pass.

Fix My Draft

Free welcome credits included. No credit card needed.