What was H. P. Lovecraft's writing process?

He kept a commonplace book, a running list of one-line germs, and the entries tend to be anomalies rather than plots, an image or a phrase with no story attached to it yet. In "Notes on Writing Weird Fiction" he describes making two outlines of the same story, one listing events in the order they happened and a second listing them in the order the reader will meet them. The gap between those two lists is where his effects live. He also knew what a rejection costs, since Weird Tales turned down "At the Mountains of Madness" and he put the manuscript away for years rather than fight for it. Steal the two outlines. That habit is worth more than any amount of vocabulary.

Which Lovecraft story should you study first, and for what?

Pick by the problem you have. "The Colour Out of Space" is the cleanest lesson in letting a method fail, and short enough to read twice in an evening. "The Shadow over Innsmouth" is the one for pacing, because you can list the explanations it removes hour by hour and watch the day tighten. "The Rats in the Walls" shows the collapse happening inside the sentences, which is where imitators tend to stop short. "At the Mountains of Madness" is the hardest and the most instructive about endings, since it explains almost everything and still lands, and "The Whisperer in Darkness" is the model for a story assembled out of correspondence. Read with a pen and mark where each door closes.

Can you write cosmic horror in plain modern English?

Yes, and the mechanics survive the move better than the vocabulary does. Two things have to make it across, a record a reader can check and one detail the record cannot hold. A claims file, a group chat, a hospital chart and a set of survey photographs will carry a certificate as well as a nineteenth-century letter does. Lovecraft's writing style is a period surface on a portable structure. Strip the archaism and what remains is a witness with a reputation, a procedure followed honestly, and a single item that ruins the file, which is a machine you can run in any register you like.

How do you write something indescribable without cheating the reader?

Earn the refusal, then place it once. The room, the weather, the instruments and the witness all get described with real precision, and the refusal is reserved for the single point of contact. Danforth's scream works because Dyer has been reliable across the whole expedition about rock, wind and anatomy. Put the same refusal on page two and you have told a reader that this narrator does not describe things, which costs you the effect for the rest of the book. One more constraint helps, which is to name the effects instead of the object, since a temperature, a sound, a taste in the mouth and a change in the light are describable and none of them puts a shape on the page.

What did Lovecraft take from detective fiction, and what did he invert?

He took the investigating narrator and reversed the outcome of the investigation. In Conan Doyle the method converts an anomaly into an explanation, and the pleasure is the closing click of a case that made no sense an hour earlier. Lovecraft keeps the fieldwork, the interviews, the archive and the reconstruction, and arranges for the method to succeed at each step except the one that matters. From the Gothic he took the inherited house and the guilty ancestry, then moved the source of the threat outside the family, where it has no interest in punishing anyone. That relocation is the invention. Guilt-driven horror needs a sinner, while indifference needs a witness, which is why his narrators are professionals with nothing to confess.

Do you need the invented towns and books to write like this?

Arkham, Miskatonic and the Necronomicon are the least portable part of his work, and they are also the easiest to replace. What they buy is institutional access. A university gives a narrator experts to consult, a library with a restricted shelf, funding that explains the trip, and colleagues whose skepticism is on the record, and those four things solve most of the plotting problems in a story about an investigation. A hospital, a police records office, an insurance company or a geological survey will supply the same. Take the institution and drop the proper nouns, because a reader who recognizes the mythos names is reading a tribute, and a reader who recognizes the paperwork is reading a story.

Fiction

H. P. LovecraftWriting Style

Born 8/20/1890 – Died 3/15/1937

Earn trust with documents and dates, then break one detail that cannot be documented. The world cracks instead of collapsing.

Write like H. P. Lovecraft

Writing Style Overview

Writing style overview of H. P. Lovecraft: voice, themes, and technique.

Professors from Miskatonic put a chip of the Arkham meteorite under a spectroscope in "The Colour Out of Space" and get bands that match nothing in their tables. They try acid. They try heat. The fragment shrinks inside its jar between visits, and by the time the men agree on a procedure there is no specimen left to run it on. Nothing has attacked anybody yet. What has gone wrong is worse than an attack for a reader who trusts instruments, because the method was applied correctly, in order, to a thing that declined to be measured.

That sequence is the engine. Lovecraft spends most of his length certifying the record, and he does it with the dullest materials available, survey notes, dates, chain of custody, a careful man's account of what he can and cannot swear to. The rupture then costs one detail. In "The Shadow out of Time" the proof waiting for the professor in the Australian ruins is a book, and the handwriting in it is his own.

His refusals are budgeted. At the end of "At the Mountains of Madness" Danforth looks back at the plateau, screams, and never says what he saw, which lands only because Dyer has spent the preceding pages naming rock strata, altitudes and the anatomy of a dissected specimen. The reader has been trained to expect an inventory. Withholding one is an event.

Two things about him are on the record together. He designed the machinery that most cosmic horror still runs on, and he was a racist whose fear of foreigners drives whole stories, openly in "The Horror at Red Hook" and structurally in "The Shadow over Innsmouth", where the contamination the plot dreads is ancestry. The machinery detaches from that. What it needs is a narrator with a reputation to lose and a world whose rules the story states before it breaks one.

How to Write Like H. P. Lovecraft

Writing techniques and exercises to emulate H. P. Lovecraft.

1
Write the certificate before you write the horror
Give the narrator a job that produces paper. A surveyor, a records clerk, a museum cataloguer, a claims adjuster, an assistant professor with a grant report due. Write the opening as their professional output rather than as a story opening, and put three checkable things in it, a date, a place a reader could look up, and a procedure done in the correct order. Being boring here is the assignment. Then add one sentence in which the narrator limits himself, saying what he heard at second hand or cannot confirm. That single limit buys more credibility than any amount of atmosphere, and it is the line a reader will remember later, when the narrator turns out to have been right to worry.
2
Fix one anomaly and refuse to upgrade it
Pick an anomaly with a unit. An angle that measures wrong, a smell with a name, a sound at a fixed interval, a temperature four degrees below the room. Put it in three separate scenes without changing a word of how you describe it. Writers instinctively escalate the description on each return, which is the fastest way to show a reader that an author rather than a world is producing the anomaly. Lovecraft repeats the same cry through "At the Mountains of Madness" unaltered, so that when it comes back in a place it has no business being, the reader supplies the terror unassisted. The restraint is the technique.
3
Route the crucial description through your worst witness
Take the paragraph where you describe the thing and hand it to the person least equipped to describe it. A frightened child, a drunk, a man watching from too far away, a translator working from a language he half knows. Cut whatever that speaker could not have seen from where he stood. What survives is a description a reader cannot audit, which is the state you want the central image to stay in for as long as possible. Lovecraft does this with a telescope and a farmer, and he does it with an old man and a bottle, and in both cases the picture arrives vivid and inadmissible at once.
4
Kill one innocent explanation per scene
List the reasons a sane person would give for your anomaly, in the order they would try them: coincidence, hoax, drink, illness, bad instruments, local legend, faulty memory. Assign one to each scene, and let the narrator argue for it honestly before the scene takes it away. Wilmarth in "The Whisperer in Darkness" opens by arguing in public that the bodies in the flooded Vermont rivers were misidentified animals, which is the sensible position, and the photographs and the sound recording arrive to remove it. A chapter that removes nothing is a chapter to cut. Speed, for this reader, is the count of dead explanations rather than the count of events.
5
End on the changed rule, and delete one sentence
Write the last page as a change of state in the narrator rather than an outcome of the plot. Sleep, appetite, faith in maps, what he will refuse to look at from now on. Give one physical residue that stays behind after the story ends, an object, a mark, a phrase he keeps repeating. Then find the sentence that names what was seen and delete it, but only if earlier pages have proved this narrator can describe things when he wants to. The ending of "The Shadow over Innsmouth" goes further, since the narrator stops resisting what he has learned about his own family and starts making plans, which is worse than dying and reads as a verdict rather than a scare.

H. P. Lovecraft's Writing Style

Breakdown of H. P. Lovecraft's writing style: sentence structure, tone, pacing, and dialogue.

Sentence Structure

His long sentences are hedges. Read one closely and you find the work of a deposition, an observation followed by the source it came from, then the limit of that source, then a concession to the skeptic, then the one consequence the narrator will sign his name to. Short sentences arrive when the hedging stops paying. "The Rats in the Walls" takes the method to its end point, where the narrator's last speech drops out of modern English into Middle English, then into Latin, then into sounds that are not language at all, so the prose performs the regression the plot has been arguing for. Copy the order, not the length. A reader has to feel the qualifications running out.

Vocabulary Complexity

Two registers, kept apart. One is archival, Latinate and cautious, thick with the words a librarian uses about provenance, editions and translations. The other is physical and blunt, and it holds what a body registers, stone, slime, odor, angle, chant. Armitage in "The Dunwich Horror" handles the Necronomicon the way a scholar handles any dangerous book, compares the Latin against the Greek, and worries about what the expurgated printings leave out, which is the trick Borges would later run on readers with invented bibliographies. Archaic diction is costume when nothing in the scene is old. Give it a document to sit on and it starts doing work.

Tone

These narrators would rather not be talking. The one in "The Call of Cthulhu" assembles his file and then hopes his executors will burn it, which is a strange thing to want for a manuscript and exactly the right posture for the voice, defensive, precise, allergic to a good line. Watch how much of the vocabulary is legal rather than atmospheric. He writes what he can attest to, marks what he heard at second hand, and flags where his memory may have improved the story. Fear reaches you through that care. The dread is in a careful man staying careful well past the point where care can help him.

Pacing

He paces by elimination. The narrator of "The Shadow over Innsmouth" spends one day on errands, and each errand shuts a door, since the ticket agent's warning removes ordinary poverty as an explanation, the grocery boy's account narrows the trouble to the Marsh family and their gold, and the bottle of whiskey that opens up Zadok Allen removes inbreeding and local superstition together. By nightfall one theory is left and the narrator cannot hold it. Three sources, three distances. "The Call of Cthulhu" runs the same procedure at longer range, from a dead professor's notes in Providence to a police raid in the Louisiana swamps to a Norwegian sailor's account handed over by his widow in Oslo, and no stage repeats what the last one settled. Count doors, not pages.

Dialogue Style

The best-informed speaker is usually the least admissible witness. Zadok Allen knows what happened to Innsmouth, and Lovecraft makes him old, drunk on the narrator's whiskey, and written off as a crank by his own town before he says a word of it. "The Dunwich Horror" pushes this to the limit, where the only direct look at the creature comes through a telescope on a hillside and reaches the reader in the thick dialect of the farmer holding the glass. Dialect carries the doubt. Distance carries the rest. Neither one lets you check the picture, and both of them let the sighting stay in the book without settling anything.

Descriptive Approach

Description here is a shape cut out of measurements. "The Colour Out of Space" gives the countryside in hard particulars, gray brittle vegetation, a stone well, fruit that grows big and tastes wrong, and the title color is the one thing in the story that can only be named by analogy. Measure the rim and the hole gets an outline. Reverse that order and you produce fog, because a reader cannot feel an absence in a room that had no furniture in it to begin with. Spend the best observed detail one step away from the thing you refuse to describe. That is the whole discipline.

Signature Writing Techniques

Signature writing techniques H. P. Lovecraft uses across their work.

The Certificate

Belief comes first, and it is bought with small accurate things. Dates, a chain of custody, a procedure performed in sequence, the name of the institution holding the sample. Small accuracies buy big improbabilities, and "The Shadow over Innsmouth" pays for its whole premise in the first paragraph, with a federal investigation, official secrecy and a submarine sent to torpedo the water beyond a reef. The cost of this tool is patience, since a certificate is dull to write and dull for two pages to read. The reward is that one impossible detail can then be spent at full value, without argument, because the reader has already accepted the terms of the document in his hands.

The Matching String

Two witnesses who could not have met produce the same string. In "The Call of Cthulhu" an anthropologist recalls a chant he wrote down among hunters in Greenland, and it matches the syllables a Louisiana police inspector heard in a swamp decades later, and the match does more work than either account alone. This is how a pattern turns into a fact for a reader. Independence is the mechanism, so the sources have to sit far apart in place, language and profession, and the shared detail has to be exact rather than similar. Get that wrong and you have two characters agreeing, which proves nothing.

The Instrument That Comes Back Empty

Apply the correct method in full and let it return nothing usable. The Miskatonic chemists in "The Colour Out of Space" run the whole apparatus of nineteenth-century chemistry over the meteorite fragment and end with a hole in the tables where a result should be. Solaris later made a library out of this move, shelf after shelf of failed scientific literature about an ocean that will not hold still for a theory. The tool solves a problem specific to horror, which is that a threat with no attempted explanation behind it looks like an author's whim. Trying and failing on the record is what makes an anomaly feel like a property of the world.

One Detail Over Budget

The rupture is a single item, and it is cheap to write. A photograph taken from life, at the end of "Pickman's Model", after a whole story about a painter's technique. A book in the wrong handwriting. A bas-relief made in a dream that matches an idol on the far side of the world. These things are small, physical, checkable and impossible to file, and none of them gets explained, since an explanation would turn the detail into a plot point and drain it. Spend one. At three, a reader starts doing arithmetic instead of worrying.

Written to Prevent Something

Dyer states his purpose in the opening pages of "At the Mountains of Madness", which is that another expedition is being outfitted and has to be stopped. That decision organizes the exposition. He can front-load technical material, skip whatever a warning would not need, and dwell on what a future traveller has to know, and a reader accepts the shape because the document has a job. A story told to entertain must justify each digression on entertainment grounds. A story told to prevent something justifies its digressions on safety grounds, which buys a writer far more room.

The Revised Rule

What breaks at the end is the reader's model of the world, and the plot is the delivery mechanism. His last movements tend to record a new rule and leave the person who learned it in worse shape than before, institutionalized, sleepless, planning something terrible, or writing the warning you have finished reading. This is harder than it looks. The rule has to be stated once, plainly, in language the narrator has earned, and it has to be about the world rather than about the monster, since a fact about one creature dies with the creature. Get that right and the story keeps working after the book is shut.

Literary Devices H. P. Lovecraft Uses

Literary devices that define H. P. Lovecraft's style.

The Nested Document That Changes Its Container

A found paper earns its place by altering the story around it. "The Whisperer in Darkness" is built out of Akeley's letters, and their sequence is the plot, since each one raises the stakes of the last, and then a letter arrives that is calm, reasonable, typed and inviting, which retroactively poisons every page before it. Compare the dossier in Dracula, where journals, cables and clippings are assembled by people trying to save someone and forced to reconcile their evidence as they go. A document that only supplies information is decoration. The test to run on every insert is one question, whether anything upstream changed meaning while the reader was inside it.

Refusal Over a Measured Rim

The famous "indescribable" holds weight only where it sits on measurement. Hemingway's version of the rule is that you may leave out what you know and the reader will feel it, while leaving out what you have not worked out produces a hollow place, and Lovecraft passes that test at his best and fails it in his weakest paragraphs. Conrad's Marlow reaches a similar effect by reporting Kurtz at second hand from the deck of a yawl on the Thames, so the center of the story arrives as testimony rather than as sight. Danforth's unfinished sentence is the pure case. Everything he could have said has been catalogued by somebody else already, so the gap has an exact size.

Escalation by Category Failure

Each stage of a Lovecraft story gives the anomaly a better name and a worse implication. First a household name, an animal or a hoax or a sickness. Then a technical one, a spectral band, a coral formation, a geometry that fails to close. Then the naming stops working, and the text has to admit it. "At the Mountains of Madness" spends its middle stretch reading a whole prehistory off the murals of the dead city, which is the most complete explanation anywhere in his work, and that explanation is what makes the tunnel at the end unbearable rather than mysterious. Understanding more is the punishment.

The Witness Turns Out to Be Evidence

His strongest endings destroy the authority of the document you have been reading. Peaslee, in "The Shadow out of Time", crosses the world to test a dream against a ruin and finds a book in his own handwriting, which converts him from investigator into exhibit. The Innsmouth narrator learns that the town's condition is in his blood, and the report he has been filing becomes a confession. Read the hedges again after that. They were accurate, and their accuracy is the trap, because a witness who kept careful track of what he could not swear to had been telling you from the first page that the record includes him.

Imitation Mistakes

Common imitation mistakes when copying H. P. Lovecraft.

Piling on archaic adjectives and calling the pile atmosphere

The words are the visible part, so imitators take them, and out comes a page where the cellar is eldritch, the angles are cyclopean and the smell is unspeakable. Contrast is what those words run on. Lovecraft's baseline prose is a dull professional register, on purpose, and the ornate vocabulary shows up in a handful of places where the narrator's control is breaking. Spread the intensity evenly and there is no break left to notice, because a reader recalibrates inside a paragraph and then reads the rest as the author's ordinary voice. The repair work happens on the flat pages, and it is no fun at all.

Withholding a description you have not written

Vagueness looks like the technique, and it is the easiest part to fake. The condition attached to it is knowledge, so leave out what you know and the reader feels the shape of it, leave out what you have not worked out and you produce a hollow place. The practical test takes a minute. Write the full description in a file the reader will not see, measurements included, then delete it and keep only the effects on the room and on the witness. A writer who cannot produce the hidden version will read as one who ran out of ideas, which is what a reader smells in most cosmic horror pastiche.

Taking the xenophobia along with the machinery

His sense of wrongness often runs on foreignness, and that part travels into a draft without anyone deciding to bring it, as the accented stranger, the neighborhood that has changed, the bloodline that got polluted. The craft cost is worth stating exactly. A fear of the people down the road is a small fear with a known object, and using it collapses the premise, since the cosmic move depends on trouble that takes no interest in human categories. The anomaly has to break a rule of the world rather than a norm of the street. Innsmouth is the clearest case, because its dread is an inherited condition and therefore scales only as far as a reader shares the author's disgust, which is not far.

Confusing a slow story with a long one

His pacing gets read as permission to take your time, and the result is chapters of travel, reading and rumination in which the narrator's hypothesis at the end is the one he had at the start. Slow, in his work, means many steps. Each stop revises the standing theory or spends a source. One useful audit is to write the narrator's current best explanation at the top and the bottom of every chapter, then cut or rebuild any chapter where the two lines match. Length is not the problem. Standing still is.

Books

Explore H. P. Lovecraft's books and discover the stories that shaped their writing style and voice.

The Call of Cthulhu
The Call of Cthulhu

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about H. P. Lovecraft's writing style and techniques.

What was H. P. Lovecraft's writing process?: He kept a commonplace book, a running list of one-line germs, and the entries tend to be anomalies rather than plots, an image or a phrase with no story attached to it yet. In "Notes on Writing Weird Fiction" he describes making two outlines of the same story, one listing events in the order they happened and a second listing them in the order the reader will meet them. The gap between those two lists is where his effects live. He also knew what a rejection costs, since Weird Tales turned down "At the Mountains of Madness" and he put the manuscript away for years rather than fight for it. Steal the two outlines. That habit is worth more than any amount of vocabulary.
Which Lovecraft story should you study first, and for what?: Pick by the problem you have. "The Colour Out of Space" is the cleanest lesson in letting a method fail, and short enough to read twice in an evening. "The Shadow over Innsmouth" is the one for pacing, because you can list the explanations it removes hour by hour and watch the day tighten. "The Rats in the Walls" shows the collapse happening inside the sentences, which is where imitators tend to stop short. "At the Mountains of Madness" is the hardest and the most instructive about endings, since it explains almost everything and still lands, and "The Whisperer in Darkness" is the model for a story assembled out of correspondence. Read with a pen and mark where each door closes.
Can you write cosmic horror in plain modern English?: Yes, and the mechanics survive the move better than the vocabulary does. Two things have to make it across, a record a reader can check and one detail the record cannot hold. A claims file, a group chat, a hospital chart and a set of survey photographs will carry a certificate as well as a nineteenth-century letter does. Lovecraft's writing style is a period surface on a portable structure. Strip the archaism and what remains is a witness with a reputation, a procedure followed honestly, and a single item that ruins the file, which is a machine you can run in any register you like.
How do you write something indescribable without cheating the reader?: Earn the refusal, then place it once. The room, the weather, the instruments and the witness all get described with real precision, and the refusal is reserved for the single point of contact. Danforth's scream works because Dyer has been reliable across the whole expedition about rock, wind and anatomy. Put the same refusal on page two and you have told a reader that this narrator does not describe things, which costs you the effect for the rest of the book. One more constraint helps, which is to name the effects instead of the object, since a temperature, a sound, a taste in the mouth and a change in the light are describable and none of them puts a shape on the page.
What did Lovecraft take from detective fiction, and what did he invert?: He took the investigating narrator and reversed the outcome of the investigation. In Conan Doyle the method converts an anomaly into an explanation, and the pleasure is the closing click of a case that made no sense an hour earlier. Lovecraft keeps the fieldwork, the interviews, the archive and the reconstruction, and arranges for the method to succeed at each step except the one that matters. From the Gothic he took the inherited house and the guilty ancestry, then moved the source of the threat outside the family, where it has no interest in punishing anyone. That relocation is the invention. Guilt-driven horror needs a sinner, while indifference needs a witness, which is why his narrators are professionals with nothing to confess.
Do you need the invented towns and books to write like this?: Arkham, Miskatonic and the Necronomicon are the least portable part of his work, and they are also the easiest to replace. What they buy is institutional access. A university gives a narrator experts to consult, a library with a restricted shelf, funding that explains the trip, and colleagues whose skepticism is on the record, and those four things solve most of the plotting problems in a story about an investigation. A hospital, a police records office, an insurance company or a geological survey will supply the same. Take the institution and drop the proper nouns, because a reader who recognizes the mythos names is reading a tribute, and a reader who recognizes the paperwork is reading a story.

Ready to improve your draft with direction?

Open Draftly, bring your draft, and move from stuck to a stronger draft without losing your voice. Editors are on standby when you want a deeper pass.

Fix My Draft

Free welcome credits included. No credit card needed.