How does Michael Lewis explain a complicated system without losing the reader?

He routes the explanation through one person's confusion. A mortgage bond, an order book or a batting statistic reaches you at the moment somebody in the story runs into it and needs it explained, which turns a lecture into a scene with a question inside it. Two habits carry it. He translates the abstraction back into something physical, so a tranche becomes a place in the queue for repayment. And he leaves out any technical detail that changes no decision, which is most of it. Start with that last habit on your own draft, since those cuts are easy and they show you which parts of the machine your story turns on.

Why do Michael Lewis's books follow outsiders instead of the people in charge?

Proximity plus non-membership. He wants somebody close enough to speak the language and far enough out that the language still sounds strange to them, which is why a doctor reading loan documents works better on the page than a mortgage trader who has read them for a decade. Distance is the instrument. The choice does three jobs at once. It gives the reader's ignorance a reason, it supplies conflict, because going against the room costs something, and it keeps the prose concrete, since only what those eyes could see may be reported. One caution comes with it. The outsider has to be shown getting things wrong, or the book becomes a profile of a genius and the system it set out to explain goes soft.

How does Michael Lewis criticize an industry without writing a hit piece?

The rules take the blame and the people get their reasons. He shows a bond salesman or a scout behaving in a way that makes sense given what pays, and the reader ends up angry at an arrangement instead of at a man. Andrew Ross Sorkin tells the same 2008 story from inside the boardrooms in Too Big to Fail, and the contrast is worth studying, because an insider account buys access and detail while Lewis aims the reader's suspicion at the machine. Fairness is a technique. Three things do that work. Sympathetic insiders, euphemism quoted intact, and consequences stated in money and rank rather than in adjectives. Drop any of the three and you have written a prosecution, which readers discount before they finish it.

How does Michael Lewis write scenes he did not witness?

Out of testimony, documents and the order in which things happened. He can tell you who was in a room, what was said and who remembers it differently, and he cannot tell you what somebody was thinking unless that person said so. The constraint shapes the prose. It pushes him towards physical detail, which a witness can supply, and towards attribution that stays visible instead of dissolving into an all-knowing voice. Gaps get used rather than filled. An open question at a section break pulls a reader forward, while a single invented line of dialogue would put every unverifiable fact in the book under suspicion, and the doubt would spread to the pages that are solid.

Can you use Michael Lewis's method without famous people or big money?

That is where it works best. A method built on one person's collision with a rule needs a system and not a celebrity, so a school district, a warehouse or a hospital rota will do. Pick the smallest complete system you can get into. Find the person inside it who keeps seeing something the others have stopped seeing, ask what that noticing has cost them, and then get the rule in writing so you can show what it rewards. Lewis wrote a book about a county health officer and another about the paperwork of a federal department. Neither subject sold itself. Both had a rule, a person and a price.

How does Michael Lewis end a chapter?

On a bill that has not come due. A section closes on a decision, a bet or a phone call whose consequence lands later, and the reader turns the page carrying an obligation. He seldom closes on a summary of what you have learned. The other habit worth stealing is the mid-scene cut, where a chapter leaves before the argument in the room resolves and the resolution arrives forty pages on, at a point where it can also do a second job. Both moves resist the urge to finish. Write your section endings last, once you know which unresolved thing each one can hand to the next.

Non fiction

Michael LewisWriting Style

Born 10/15/1960

Give the explaining job to the one person in the room who does not fit, and mechanism turns into suspense.

Write like Michael Lewis

Writing Style Overview

Writing style overview of Michael Lewis: voice, themes, and technique.

Moneyball puts you in a draft room where paid scouts argue about a catcher's body. The player can hit. He also looks wrong to men whose job is looking, and Lewis lets them say so at length, in their own vocabulary, before anyone explains why the front office wants him. That order is the method.

Michael Lewis explains a system by attaching himself to somebody the system does not fit. Moneyball introduces Billy Beane as the can't-miss prospect whose playing career fell short, then makes him the man who stops trusting what scouts see. In The Big Short, a doctor with a glass eye sits alone reading mortgage-bond prospectuses. The reading itself is the edge. In Flash Boys, a trader at a Canadian bank watches his own orders vanish from the screen and cannot get anybody to explain it, and his search for that explanation turns into the investigation the book follows. Each misfit gives the reader's ignorance an address. You meet the rules where that person meets them, which is at the point of collision.

The technical work is in what he holds back. A chapter shows you a decision before it shows you the rule that made the decision sane, and the gap between those two things is where the reading energy comes from. He also cannot invent, which removes the novelist's easiest tools: no interior monologue he did not get from the person, no dialogue without a source, and no composite character assembled out of three real ones to keep a scene tidy. Tension has to be built out of order, selection and delay.

The transferable part is the architecture. Pick the person who paid a price for noticing something, stay inside what that person could plausibly know, and hand the reader each piece of machinery at the moment a decision depends on it. Kahneman and Amos Tversky get this treatment in The Undoing Project, where the research reaches you through two friends arguing rather than as a summary of findings. The subjects change. The method stays put.

How to Write Like Michael Lewis

Writing techniques and exercises to emulate Michael Lewis.

1
Find the person the system does not fit
Before you outline, name the one human being whose position inside your subject is wrong. Not the boss. The person close enough to speak the vocabulary and far enough out that the vocabulary still sounds strange: the new hire, the doctor who left medicine, the assistant who gets consulted last. Write three lists. What they know, what they cannot know, and what noticing has cost them so far. That third list is your plot, and in Moneyball it is why Billy Beane, once a prospect himself, stops believing the men who rate prospects.
2
Hold the mechanism until a decision needs it
List every piece of machinery a reader must have: the rule, the fee, the formula, the reward. Then find, for each one, the moment somebody in your story has to act on it. Move the explanation there. Nothing gets explained on arrival and nothing gets explained twice. The test is quick and unpleasant: cut a paragraph of explanation and see whether any later decision becomes unreadable, because if none does, that paragraph was standing there to reassure you that the reporting had been done.
3
Put the number in a body
A figure on its own does nothing to a reader. Attach it to a person who has to live with it and it starts behaving like a threat. On-base percentage means something in Moneyball at the point where it overrules a scout and puts an unwanted player on the field. Do the same with your own material. For each quantity that matters, write the sentence in which somebody gains or loses because of where that number landed, and if no such sentence exists, the quantity is decoration and can go.
4
Report the scene you did not see
You were not in the room, so build the scene from what testimony can carry: who was present, what was said, the order things happened in, and who remembers it differently. Attribute inside the sentence and leave the seams visible. A reader forgives a gap. One invented line of dialogue costs you every fact in the book that cannot be checked. Where the record is thin, put the thinness on the page and use it, since an open question at a section break pulls harder than a confident summary.
5
Cut the sentences that tell the reader what to feel
Read the draft hunting only for your own commentary. Any sentence that files a decision as reckless, brave or absurd is doing work the scene should have done, and taking it out usually makes the scene louder. Then run a second pass and ask of each scene what it proves. Whatever proves nothing goes, however good the material. A third pass checks your guide: if she has been right on every page, you have written a saint's life, so put her worst call back in.

Michael Lewis's Writing Style

Breakdown of Michael Lewis's writing style: sentence structure, tone, pacing, and dialogue.

Sentence Structure

A typical Lewis paragraph runs plain, plain, then long. He states a fact in the flattest available words, adds a second fact that seems unrelated, then spends one long sentence tying them into a consequence neither fact carried on its own. Verdicts are short. Definitions travel inside the sentence rather than beside it, so a term he needs gets a three-word gloss between commas and the sentence keeps moving, which is how a term like tranche or credit default swap lands in The Big Short without a halt. He saves the flat declarative for the moment a reader expects drama. When a subordinate clause shows up, it usually carries the cost of something.

Vocabulary Complexity

He spends his precision budget on two or three terms and uses kitchen words for the rest. A mortgage bond becomes a pile of loans that pays out in a fixed order, and once the reader owns that picture the industry term can be dropped in without losing anybody. Jargon appears where the jargon is the exhibit. A desk's nickname for its own customers, or a scout's word for a body type, stays untranslated. Verbs stay physical. Things get stuffed, dumped, sliced, hidden. Abstractions seldom act alone in his sentences, so a rule pushes a person, a bonus pulls one, and a screen shows a price that has already gone.

Tone

Deadpan, and patient with people it would be easy to mock. Lewis builds an absurdity and then steps aside, which leaves the reader to notice it first. The people inside the system are rarely stupid in his telling. They respond sensibly to rules that reward the wrong thing, and that reading is what keeps a book from turning into a prosecution. Moral pressure arrives as arithmetic: who got paid, who carried the risk, who was moved out of the way. Warmth shows up in odd places, mostly around the fixers and the overlooked. The Premonition treats a county health officer's frustration as the most interesting thing in the room, and the reader is invited to find the institution puzzling rather than wicked, which is a harder position to hold than contempt and a more useful one for anybody who has to work inside such a place.

Pacing

Flash Boys begins with a crew cutting a trench through Pennsylvania rock for a fiber line, and a good while passes before you learn who ordered the line or why a straighter route was worth the money. That delay is deliberate. Lewis keeps one question open and pays it off in stages, so a chapter that has to explain something dry opens on somebody about to win or lose. McPhee does something comparable with his structural diagrams, though he tends to hold a whole book in one shape while Lewis rebuilds the pressure chapter by chapter. The Big Short withholds the anatomy of a collateralized debt obligation until several people have already bet against one, by which point a reader wants the definition badly enough to sit through three paragraphs of bond structure. Scenes cut early. A section ends on a decision whose bill has not arrived.

Dialogue Style

Quoted speech is evidence. Lewis picks lines that convict the speaker of a worldview, then declines to comment. Scouts in Moneyball praise how a prospect looks, and the sentence sits there unglossed. Bond salesmen in Liar's Poker have their own word for the customers they sell to, and that word settles the argument about how the desk saw those customers, which lets him leave the ethics of the transaction to the vocabulary. He keeps the profanity, and he keeps the euphemism, because an institution's polite phrase for a bad practice is the shortest route to the practice. Long transcripts are rare. Where a gloss follows a quotation, it runs one sentence and explains what the line means inside the system rather than what the speaker felt.

Descriptive Approach

Description does two jobs here. It marks a person so you can recognize them fifty pages later, and it smuggles in a social fact while it does that. Chad Bradford throws underhand in Moneyball. Michael Oher arrives in The Blind Side as a set of measurements, a body the institutions around him price before anybody treats him as a person. Rooms get the same rationing. The Salomon Brothers trading floor in Liar's Poker comes to you through what the job did to the people standing on it, which is a different move from painting the room. Weather, faces and clothes rarely appear for atmosphere. Mood is not the job. A detail earns its place by being the thing that resists a tidy summary.

Signature Writing Techniques

Signature writing techniques Michael Lewis uses across their work.

The Rule as Antagonist

Conflict comes from a rule that pays people to do the wrong thing, so no character has to be cast as the villain. Write the reward out loud: what gets somebody promoted, what gets them laughed at, what gets them fired. Name the payment. The Big Short works partly because the men selling the bonds are following their pay, and their pay was set by somebody following his. This keeps a book arguable rather than accusing. The hard part is staying concrete, since a named fee carries the weight and a general reference to greed does not.

Two Parties Who Cannot Walk Away

Choose your opposing sides so that leaving is not available to either. Scouts and the front office in Moneyball share one draft room and one budget, which forces the argument to happen in front of you instead of in memos. An investor betting against a bond has to keep buying the other side of the trade from the people whose product he is calling worthless, a relationship with no door in it, which is why the Las Vegas conference chapters of The Big Short read like a negotiation between people who cannot afford to leave the table. Where two parties can stop speaking at any point, the tension leaks out. Look for shared rooms, shared money and shared deadlines before you look for a dramatic disagreement.

Consequence First, Cause Afterwards

He will show the outcome, then go back for the machinery that produced it. A reader who already knows a fortune was made reads the setup as a puzzle rather than as background. This solves a problem specific to nonfiction, because his outcomes are public knowledge and the suspense cannot come from the ending. Readers came to The Big Short knowing the housing market collapsed. The question the book runs on is how a handful of people saw it early and what holding that position cost them. Ask what your reader already knows, then build the tension out of the how.

The Unglamorous Department

Take the least covered part of a system and put it at the front. The Fifth Risk approaches the federal government through the actual job list of the Department of Energy, which includes nuclear waste and the electrical grid, subjects that get no airtime in a campaign. The Premonition finds its lens in a county health officer rather than a federal agency. The payoff is a subject with no competing coverage, where your reporting is the reader's first encounter and every mechanism is fresh. The risk is that a dry-sounding beat needs a person with something to lose inside the first two pages.

The Two-Track Chapter

A chapter alternates between somebody doing something and a compact account of what makes that possible, then returns to the action at a higher price. The handoff is the whole craft. The stall is the risk. An explanation should end by raising the stakes of the scene you are about to re-enter, so it reads as ammunition rather than as a pause. Time the switches by watching for the point where a reader would ask a question, then answer that question and stop. Longer explanatory runs become possible late in a book, once the reader trusts that a payment is coming.

The Unanswered Question from the Last Book

Moneyball left a question hanging about why experienced scouts misjudge players, and The Undoing Project goes after the psychology of that misjudgement. Working this way gives a body of books a spine, and it lets a writer take a second run at a subject with better tools. Keep a list of what you could not explain last time. One of those items is your next piece. The discipline is choosing the question you failed to answer over the subject that did well.

Literary Devices Michael Lewis Uses

Literary devices that define Michael Lewis's style.

Reader-Ahead Irony

Lewis gives you the rule first, then shows the people still living inside the story they tell about themselves. Once you know how a bond desk gets paid, a meeting about serving the client reads as comedy, and no participant has to be caught lying for that to work. The device buys compression. Two pages of moral argument collapse into one scene where somebody says a sincere thing the incentive underneath him contradicts. It also keeps a critical book from scolding, because the judgment happens in the reader's head, on evidence, instead of in the narrator's asides.

One Object for the Whole System

He picks one physical thing and loads a structure onto it that would otherwise need a chapter. The straight line through the mountains in Flash Boys is a fiber cable and also the entire argument about what a few milliseconds are worth. Liar's Poker uses the game itself, a bluffing contest played with the serial numbers on dollar bills, as the shape of the firm around it. The Blind Side hands the job to a position on the field, since what a left tackle is paid says what the sport decided a body was for, and that one salary does more work than a chapter on the economics of the game could have done. The object has to be representative and not merely striking, or the reader keeps a nice detail and learns nothing from it.

The Recognition Scene, Staged Small

The turn where somebody sees the whole game gets a tiny stage. A screen that will not do what it should. A dinner where a stranger explains his job with pride and his listener works out what it means. Lewis prefers these to the summary he could have written, because a reader who watches the penny drop for one person keeps the shape of the insight afterwards. The scene has to stay small. Given a speech, the same moment turns into a position paper, and the reader files it rather than feeling it.

The Opening Detour

A book often starts where the wrong subject seems to be. The Blind Side opens on a televised play in which a linebacker breaks a quarterback's leg, and you have no idea yet that this will be a book about a boy in Memphis and the market for the man who protects that quarterback. The Undoing Project starts in professional basketball, a long way from two psychologists in Jerusalem. The detour pays. It works because that opening is the premise in disguise, so a reader promised one thing gets the frame for it instead. Done badly it is a bait and switch, and the difference is whether the opening scene becomes the measure for everything after it.

Imitation Mistakes

Common imitation mistakes when copying Michael Lewis.

Borrowing the voice and skipping the reporting

The jokes and the shrug are the easiest parts to lift, and they hold weight only when something underneath them has been established. Copied bare, the voice reads as somebody being knowing about a subject they have not worked out. Lewis can afford a one-line verdict on a trade because the three pages before it showed the trade happening. Without those pages the verdict is an opinion in costume. Readers hear the difference. The repair is unglamorous: get the mechanism right, then let the tone follow from knowing how the thing works.

Stacking good anecdotes with no question holding them

Five vivid scenes in a row do not add up. Each of his scenes answers a question the previous one raised, which is why a chapter about a pitcher with an odd delivery lands as an argument about how talent gets mispriced. Without that spine you produce a list with better prose, and a reader who enjoyed page 40 and cannot say what page 60 is for, which is the particular failure that makes a well-reported book feel weightless. Write your controlling question on one line and hold every scene against it. Two scenes that answer the same question mean one of them is furniture.

Turning the outsider into a genius

Admiration destroys the thing that made the outsider useful, which was friction. A guide who is right in every scene stops measuring the system and starts endorsing the author. The Big Short keeps its investors difficult, odd and early in ways that hurt them, and it keeps the stretches where they looked wrong. Idea-first nonfiction of the Gladwell kind sidesteps the problem by building from studies instead of people, which is a different bargain, since a finding is easier to tidy than a man who has to act on one. Give your guide a bad call, a self-interest and a blind spot, and the system comes back into view.

Front-loading the system to look competent

A chapter of setup before anything happens is a common failure, and it comes from anxiety rather than laziness. The writer knows the material is complicated and wants to prove she can hold it. What reaches the reader is a lecture with a story attached. Trust the reader's patience. Lewis inverts the order on purpose: confusion first, then the tool that resolves it. Push your explanation later than feels safe, because a reader kept waiting one page too long leans in, while a reader handed the machinery before wanting it puts the book down.

Books

Explore Michael Lewis's books and discover the stories that shaped their writing style and voice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Michael Lewis's writing style and techniques.

How does Michael Lewis explain a complicated system without losing the reader?: He routes the explanation through one person's confusion. A mortgage bond, an order book or a batting statistic reaches you at the moment somebody in the story runs into it and needs it explained, which turns a lecture into a scene with a question inside it. Two habits carry it. He translates the abstraction back into something physical, so a tranche becomes a place in the queue for repayment. And he leaves out any technical detail that changes no decision, which is most of it. Start with that last habit on your own draft, since those cuts are easy and they show you which parts of the machine your story turns on.
Why do Michael Lewis's books follow outsiders instead of the people in charge?: Proximity plus non-membership. He wants somebody close enough to speak the language and far enough out that the language still sounds strange to them, which is why a doctor reading loan documents works better on the page than a mortgage trader who has read them for a decade. Distance is the instrument. The choice does three jobs at once. It gives the reader's ignorance a reason, it supplies conflict, because going against the room costs something, and it keeps the prose concrete, since only what those eyes could see may be reported. One caution comes with it. The outsider has to be shown getting things wrong, or the book becomes a profile of a genius and the system it set out to explain goes soft.
How does Michael Lewis criticize an industry without writing a hit piece?: The rules take the blame and the people get their reasons. He shows a bond salesman or a scout behaving in a way that makes sense given what pays, and the reader ends up angry at an arrangement instead of at a man. Andrew Ross Sorkin tells the same 2008 story from inside the boardrooms in Too Big to Fail, and the contrast is worth studying, because an insider account buys access and detail while Lewis aims the reader's suspicion at the machine. Fairness is a technique. Three things do that work. Sympathetic insiders, euphemism quoted intact, and consequences stated in money and rank rather than in adjectives. Drop any of the three and you have written a prosecution, which readers discount before they finish it.
How does Michael Lewis write scenes he did not witness?: Out of testimony, documents and the order in which things happened. He can tell you who was in a room, what was said and who remembers it differently, and he cannot tell you what somebody was thinking unless that person said so. The constraint shapes the prose. It pushes him towards physical detail, which a witness can supply, and towards attribution that stays visible instead of dissolving into an all-knowing voice. Gaps get used rather than filled. An open question at a section break pulls a reader forward, while a single invented line of dialogue would put every unverifiable fact in the book under suspicion, and the doubt would spread to the pages that are solid.
Can you use Michael Lewis's method without famous people or big money?: That is where it works best. A method built on one person's collision with a rule needs a system and not a celebrity, so a school district, a warehouse or a hospital rota will do. Pick the smallest complete system you can get into. Find the person inside it who keeps seeing something the others have stopped seeing, ask what that noticing has cost them, and then get the rule in writing so you can show what it rewards. Lewis wrote a book about a county health officer and another about the paperwork of a federal department. Neither subject sold itself. Both had a rule, a person and a price.
How does Michael Lewis end a chapter?: On a bill that has not come due. A section closes on a decision, a bet or a phone call whose consequence lands later, and the reader turns the page carrying an obligation. He seldom closes on a summary of what you have learned. The other habit worth stealing is the mid-scene cut, where a chapter leaves before the argument in the room resolves and the resolution arrives forty pages on, at a point where it can also do a second job. Both moves resist the urge to finish. Write your section endings last, once you know which unresolved thing each one can hand to the next.

Ready to improve your draft with direction?

Open Draftly, bring your draft, and move from stuck to a stronger draft without losing your voice. Editors are on standby when you want a deeper pass.

Fix My Draft

Free welcome credits included. No credit card needed.