How does Tara Westover write about memories she cannot verify?

She separates the claim from the doubt. The scene itself is written without hedges, in physical detail, and where her memory conflicts with somebody else's the conflict goes into a footnote where you can see it. Educated even opens by conceding that one of her strongest memories began as something she imagined. That order matters more than it looks. The admission comes first, so the certainty that follows reads as a considered choice rather than a bluff. For your own draft the practical form is two documents: one holds the scene, the other holds everything you are unsure of, and only the uncertainties that would change a meaning get promoted onto the page.

Why does Tara Westover hold her hindsight back?

Because the reader has to be allowed to be wrong first, in the same way the narrator once was. If the later voice explains what an event meant before the event has played out, the scene turns into an illustration of a conclusion and there is nothing left to discover. Westover writes from inside the past self's information, then interrupts for one sentence at the decision point, which changes how you read the decision while you are still in it. The interruption is short by design. A long one starts to sound like a defence.

What makes Tara Westover's plain sentences hit so hard?

Selection, and where the plainness falls. Her prose gets quieter as the material gets worse, so the moment that would justify heat is the moment the adjectives vanish and the sentences shrink to physical fact. You supply the reaction the paragraph withheld, and a reaction you produced yourself is harder to argue with than one you were handed. This is the old figure of litotes doing a modern job. Test it on your own draft. Delete the line that instructs the reader's response, read the passage aloud, and listen for whether the facts you kept can carry it without help.

How does Educated stay tense when you know how it ends?

Two clocks, running at different speeds. The events move forward in their order while the narrator's ability to name them lags years behind, so the question driving the pages is when she will be able to say it rather than what happened. Repetition does the rest. A situation comes back in slightly altered form, you learn its shape, and the dread arrives ahead of the incident because you can see the pattern the narrator is still living inside.

Can this method work on material with no family conflict in it?

Yes, and the mechanism has little to do with families. What it needs is a past self whose model of the world was wrong in a way you can now describe: a job you defended, a belief you held, a place whose rules you took as given. Write the scene inside that old model. Correct it once, briefly, at the point where the model produced a decision. Hold your conclusion back and let the facts you chose do the arguing, and Westover's structure is working on your material with your voice on top of it.

How do you write like Tara Westover without copying her subject?

Take the sequence rather than the tone. That calm register is a downstream effect. It comes out of three earlier decisions: how much the narrator is permitted to understand while a scene is running, where the doubt gets filed, and which facts are allowed to carry the meaning. Copy the register alone and the writing goes cold, since there is nothing underneath for a reader to complete. Start instead with one scene drafted inside your old information, a single line of correction placed at a choice, and the explaining sentence removed, then see how much of your material survives the loss of your own commentary. Your sentences can stay yours. The architecture is the part that transfers.

Non fiction

Tara WestoverWriting Style

Born 9/27/1986

Show the scene first and name its meaning much later. Understanding clicks into place instead of being handed over.

Write like Tara Westover

Writing Style Overview

Writing style overview of Tara Westover: voice, themes, and technique.

Educated opens with a memory its author says is not a memory. She imagined something as a child, then kept the picture and lost track of where it came from. That admission sits before the first chapter, and it does work no disclaimer could do, because a narrator who tells you at the door that her instrument is bent has earned the right to sound certain everywhere else.

Her second move on the same problem happens downstairs. Where her account of an event and another person's account come apart, the disagreement goes into a footnote and the scene above it stays unhedged. The payoff is large. A leg can catch fire in the junkyard and the prose can report what the family did next without stopping to qualify itself, because the doubt has a channel of its own and the reader can watch her use it.

What she holds back is judgement. Scene after scene gives the physical sequence and declines to name what it means, which leaves the naming to you. Anyone who has read Jeannette Walls on her own childhood will recognise the household and then feel the difference, since The Glass Castle keeps the child's eye nearly throughout while Westover lets a colder, later voice cut in for one sentence and then withdraw.

Writers come to her for the calm and copy the wrong thing. The calm is a result. It comes out of a decision about sequence, about what the girl in the scene is allowed to know and how long the woman at the desk is kept out of it. Get that order right and plain sentences will carry material that should break them. Get it wrong and the same sentences read as shock in one paragraph and sermon in the next.

How to Write Like Tara Westover

Writing techniques and exercises to emulate Tara Westover.

1
Draft inside the information you had
Take one event and write it using only what your past self could see, hear and believe in that moment. Then go through the draft with a pen and mark every place where later knowledge leaked in: a motive you worked out years afterwards, a diagnosis, a word you did not own yet. Strike those, or move them. The prologue of Educated does this in miniature by conceding at the outset that one of her strongest memories began in her imagination, which buys the scenes that follow their confidence. The test is quick. If your younger self sounds as clever as you are now, the scene has stopped being evidence and become an assertion.
2
Give your doubt a channel of its own
Keep a second file beside the draft. Each time you catch yourself writing "as I recall" or "I think it was July", take the hedge out of the sentence and log the uncertainty in the file instead. When you hit a real conflict, where someone who was in the room remembers it otherwise, put that on the page as a note rather than dissolving it into the narration, which is what the footnotes in Educated do. The scene above the line then gets to stay specific and unqualified, and your reader trusts it more, because they can see exactly where your claim stops. Hedges inside a sentence spread. A note stays where you put it.
3
Report it, then delete the line that explains it
Write the hardest material you have as a chain of physical facts and nothing else, in the order they happened. Who did what, and how it looked afterwards. Now find the sentence that does your reader's feeling for them, and cut it. Read aloud what is left. In Educated a boy's leg catches fire in the junkyard and the narration stays with the gasoline, the water, the work that went on, and the judgement forms in the reader unassisted, which is also why it sticks. If the meaning collapses once your explanation is gone, the trouble is the facts you chose and not the missing line.
4
Time the correction to the decision
Find the moment where your past self chooses something. One sentence of hindsight belongs there, not at the end of the scene, because a correction placed before the choice changes how the choice reads while the reader is still inside it. Give each insertion exactly one job: fix a fact, name a pattern, or admit a blind spot. Then cut any insertion that sounds wise. Westover's later voice is precise and a little cold, and it stays for a single sentence, which is why it reads as testimony instead of commentary.
5
Build the routine before you break it
Write three ordinary versions of a recurring situation before you write the one that goes wrong. The same doorway, the same joke, the same Saturday job. Keep them short. Keep them boring on purpose, because your reader has to learn the rule before a break in it can register as more than an incident. Then change one element: someone refuses, an outsider is watching, a fact arrives that cannot be renamed. Educated spends long stretches on canned peaches and stockpiled fuel for the end of the world, and that patience is what makes a later scene land as the collapse of a system rather than a bad day.

Tara Westover's Writing Style

Breakdown of Tara Westover's writing style: sentence structure, tone, pacing, and dialogue.

Sentence Structure

Her default sentence is short, end-stopped, and built on a verb of physical work. At the turn of a scene she lets one run, hanging clause on clause until the reader has to hold three facts at the same time and feel them grind against each other, which is the only place in her prose where the syntax is allowed to get as crowded as the situation. The pattern is control, not decoration. Short for what happened. Long for what it cost to understand it. She likes to end a paragraph on the shortest sentence available, which is why so many of them shut like a door. Tara Westover's writing style puts the strain into the syntax and leaves the vocabulary alone, and that is why a page of it can be read aloud without anyone reaching for a dictionary.

Vocabulary Complexity

Two word stocks lie in this book without mixing. One belongs to the mountain and the junkyard: scrap, iron, bins, fuel, tincture, salve. The other arrives late and borrowed, and the book stages its arrival as an event. In a lecture hall at Brigham Young University the narrator raises her hand to ask what the word Holocaust means. The sentence reporting it is flat. Nothing in the paragraph explains to you what the room understood, and the omission is the reason the moment lands, because what the narrator can name on a given page is this book's real measure of where she is standing.

Tone

Cold is the word reviewers reach for, and it is close enough to be misleading. The voice belongs to a witness who has decided that overstating one detail would put the whole account in doubt, and who therefore gives up most of what memoir usually spends its warmth on. There are no appeals to the reader. There is no rehearsal of pain for effect. Where Mary Karr earns your company with comedy and confiding asides, Westover offers neither, and the absence works on you like a held breath. She does allow uncertainty onto the page, which is a different thing from hedging: she will say that she does not know, and then go on describing what she does. The gap is left open.

Pacing

Educated runs forward in the order events happened. Its understanding runs in another order, and the pacing lives in the distance between those two clocks. Years on the mountain can pass in a clause while one afternoon in the junkyard gets the full physical inventory, because the afternoon is where a house rule becomes visible, and one visible rule is worth more pages than a year. She also declines the summary that would let you off early. When a situation recurs, she writes the recurrence out, and by the third time the reader dreads the shape of it well before the narrator has a word for it. The one thing she hurries is aftermath. Recovery gets a sentence. The next scene starts.

Dialogue Style

Listen for who gets to name things. Her father's speech puts doctors and public schools on the same side of a war, and the family's word for an event tends to be whichever word keeps the family whole. Arguments here are rarely about facts. They are about labels, which is why the lines can stay this short and still carry a scene. She withholds the reply as well. A line lands, the paragraph turns to what someone's hands were doing, and the answer you want is left out, so the silence after the line becomes the loudest part of the exchange and the reply you were waiting for arrives only in your own head.

Descriptive Approach

Buck's Peak gets described the way a working family describes a slope, by what it does to a truck, a body, a season, and the description shifts with the work rather than with her mood. The rock formation her family called the Indian Princess comes back through the book, and each return measures the narrator rather than the mountain. Details are chosen for consequence. Metal that cuts. Fuel that catches. A bin that has to be filled before dark. When she does reach for an abstraction, she pins it to an object inside a line or two, and that habit is why the book can hold a sentence about faith without drifting off the page.

Signature Writing Techniques

Signature writing techniques Tara Westover uses across their work.

The unhedged scene

She writes the scene as though a camera were running, with no qualifiers in the prose at all, and puts the qualifying somewhere else. The problem it fixes is a real one for memoir, since a narrator who hedges inside her sentences is teaching the reader to discount every sentence, including the ones she would stake her name on. The hard part is sorting, because you have to know which of your uncertainties are load-bearing. If the doubt would change what the scene means, it belongs in the note. If it would only protect you, cut it.

One-sentence hindsight

The later voice gets a line, occasionally two, and then the scene takes the floor back. Each intervention does a single job, correcting a fact or naming a pattern, and it sits at a decision rather than behind the outcome. The brevity is what makes it credible, because a narrator who explains at length starts to sound like someone defending a verdict, and defence is the one tone that sends a reader looking for the other side of the story. Try the deletion test on your own draft. Take the hindsight line out and see whether the scene loses information or only loses reassurance.

Clean-fact intensity

At the highest stakes she reports and stops. What was said, what was done, what the injury looked like. The lineage runs through the plainest witnesses in nonfiction, Primo Levi above all, whose even register carried material no amount of rhetorical heat could have carried. Choosing which facts take the load is the difficult part, and a wrong choice reads as coldness rather than restraint. The rule she seems to work by is that a detail earns its place by having a consequence later in the book, and a detail that was only vivid goes, however much it cost her to remember it.

The fight over the word

Two people look at the same event and reach for different nouns, and the memoir treats that as the actual conflict. Whoever names the thing decides what happens next. That is how the dialogue in this book can stay short and domestic and still be entirely about power. Watch what it saves her. She has no need of a paragraph arguing that a household can rewrite an event, because the reader has already watched it happen in four lines of speech. To build one, you need the same event named twice, some distance between the two namings, and a consequence that shows which name won.

Threshold logistics

The big turns in this book are physical and administrative: a form filled in, a test sat, a bus taken, a door in a building whose rules she has not been told. The concrete apparatus carries the feeling, and it keeps a scene of enormous change from tipping into ceremony, which is the failure mode of nearly every threshold in memoir. Late in the memoir she is on the roof of King's College Chapel in the wind, and the passage stays with feet, stone and weather. That is the whole method in one image. Keep the logistics and the meaning looks after itself.

Two clocks

Event time moves forward in Educated while comprehension time lags behind it by years, and she keeps both visible. Verlyn Klinkenborg's point about composition applies to reading it too, that there is no arrow for memory the way there is one for time, so a writer is free to let understanding arrive out of order. This is the engine under the book's suspense. You know roughly where the story ends, and you keep reading to find out when the narrator will be able to say what happened, which is a different question from what happened.

Literary Devices Tara Westover Uses

Literary devices that define Tara Westover's style.

Retrospective first person, held apart

The girl in the scene believes what she believes, the woman writing knows better, and Westover keeps the two voices from bleeding into each other. Wayne Booth described this kind of narrator as mistaken rather than lying, which is the register here exactly. Harper Lee built To Kill a Mockingbird on the same double vision, Scout's experience narrated by an adult who has had years to think it over, and the memoir version is harder because the writer cannot invent the moment that would make the gap visible. She has to find one. What the device buys is tension in scenes with no suspense in them at all, since you see the shape of the danger a paragraph before the narrator does.

The footnote as counter-testimony

Where accounts of an event diverge, Educated says so in a note at the foot of the page and lets both versions stand. The effect on the main narrative runs opposite to what you would expect, because a book that admits its gaps in one register is free to be flatly specific in the other. James Wood's phrase for a narrator whose distortions the author quietly flags is reliably unreliable, and here the flagging and the distorting are done by one person about herself. Few memoirists take that risk. It turns the liability that memory is contested into the strongest evidence of good faith the form has.

Understatement where the volume should rise

The classical name for it is litotes, and the modern instruction is Hemingway's, to give the experience rather than depict it. Westover's version works like this: at the peak of a scene the adjectives fall away, the sentences shorten and turn physical, and the prose reaches its lowest volume in the place where another book would look for its highest. Injuries are described as injuries. The ear registers that withdrawal as control and then does the emotional work the sentences left undone, which is why readers report a devastating book without being able to point at a devastating sentence.

A motif that measures the narrator

The mountain, the formation on its face, the scrap in the yard: these come back, and what changes is the narrator's relation to them rather than the things. Repetition does structural work a single symbol cannot, because it operates across time and lets a reader feel a shift nobody announced. A motif also protects the book from its own drama. Any one incident could be waved away as an outlier, and a recurrence cannot, so the pattern carries the argument the narration refuses to state, which is how a book that asserts almost nothing still manages to make a case.

Imitation Mistakes

Common imitation mistakes when copying Tara Westover.

Copying the flat surface and skipping the sequence

The sentences are the easiest thing to copy, so they are what gets copied. Adjectives stripped, verbs physical, paragraphs ending short. The effect is produced further upstream, in the question of what the narrator is allowed to know on each page, and that decision is settled long before a single adjective gets chosen. Strip the adjectives out of a scene where your narrator already understands everything and you get affectlessness, which reads as a mannerism instead of a discipline, and a reader can feel the difference inside a paragraph. Westover's plainness is load-bearing because the structure holds the weight, and prose that plain with nothing under it only makes the emptiness easier to see.

Letting the older narrator win the argument

The temptation is to prove that you have grown, so the retrospective voice gets longer and wiser with every scene until the past self is a puppet being moved around for an audience. Then the tension goes. A reader who has been handed the conclusion in advance has nothing left to do with the scene. Educated keeps its corrections short and slightly cold, and it lets her younger self be wrong at length without rescuing her. Ask of each hindsight passage whether it changes how the next paragraph reads, and if it only demonstrates that you know better now, it is there for you rather than for the book.

Hedging inside the sentence instead of beside it

Honest writers who worry about their memory tend to spread the worry across the prose, a "perhaps" here, an "as far as I remember" there. Each of those is a small instruction to discount what follows, and enough of them will hollow out a book. Westover splits the two jobs, and that is the move worth stealing. The narration commits. The note admits. Jami Attenberg names distance as a condition of candour, looking at the thing in the rearview mirror rather than in the middle of the intersection, and that distance is what lets a writer be specific and uncertain at once without sounding evasive.

Casting one villain so the story reads clean

Reducing a household to a single culprit makes a memoir less believable rather than clearer. The tension in Educated depends on ordinary loyalty being real, on people who feed each other and work beside each other, because that is what makes the trap legible from outside it. Flatten them into monsters and your reader starts asking why anyone stayed, which is the question the book could least afford. It also disarms the tools. Naming fights, withheld judgement and pattern accumulation all need a world in which two readings of an event are genuinely available, and a monster leaves the reader with only one.

Books

Explore Tara Westover's books and discover the stories that shaped their writing style and voice.

Educated
Educated

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Tara Westover's writing style and techniques.

How does Tara Westover write about memories she cannot verify?: She separates the claim from the doubt. The scene itself is written without hedges, in physical detail, and where her memory conflicts with somebody else's the conflict goes into a footnote where you can see it. Educated even opens by conceding that one of her strongest memories began as something she imagined. That order matters more than it looks. The admission comes first, so the certainty that follows reads as a considered choice rather than a bluff. For your own draft the practical form is two documents: one holds the scene, the other holds everything you are unsure of, and only the uncertainties that would change a meaning get promoted onto the page.
Why does Tara Westover hold her hindsight back?: Because the reader has to be allowed to be wrong first, in the same way the narrator once was. If the later voice explains what an event meant before the event has played out, the scene turns into an illustration of a conclusion and there is nothing left to discover. Westover writes from inside the past self's information, then interrupts for one sentence at the decision point, which changes how you read the decision while you are still in it. The interruption is short by design. A long one starts to sound like a defence.
What makes Tara Westover's plain sentences hit so hard?: Selection, and where the plainness falls. Her prose gets quieter as the material gets worse, so the moment that would justify heat is the moment the adjectives vanish and the sentences shrink to physical fact. You supply the reaction the paragraph withheld, and a reaction you produced yourself is harder to argue with than one you were handed. This is the old figure of litotes doing a modern job. Test it on your own draft. Delete the line that instructs the reader's response, read the passage aloud, and listen for whether the facts you kept can carry it without help.
How does Educated stay tense when you know how it ends?: Two clocks, running at different speeds. The events move forward in their order while the narrator's ability to name them lags years behind, so the question driving the pages is when she will be able to say it rather than what happened. Repetition does the rest. A situation comes back in slightly altered form, you learn its shape, and the dread arrives ahead of the incident because you can see the pattern the narrator is still living inside.
Can this method work on material with no family conflict in it?: Yes, and the mechanism has little to do with families. What it needs is a past self whose model of the world was wrong in a way you can now describe: a job you defended, a belief you held, a place whose rules you took as given. Write the scene inside that old model. Correct it once, briefly, at the point where the model produced a decision. Hold your conclusion back and let the facts you chose do the arguing, and Westover's structure is working on your material with your voice on top of it.
How do you write like Tara Westover without copying her subject?: Take the sequence rather than the tone. That calm register is a downstream effect. It comes out of three earlier decisions: how much the narrator is permitted to understand while a scene is running, where the doubt gets filed, and which facts are allowed to carry the meaning. Copy the register alone and the writing goes cold, since there is nothing underneath for a reader to complete. Start instead with one scene drafted inside your old information, a single line of correction placed at a choice, and the explaining sentence removed, then see how much of your material survives the loss of your own commentary. Your sentences can stay yours. The architecture is the part that transfers.

Ready to improve your draft with direction?

Open Draftly, bring your draft, and move from stuck to a stronger draft without losing your voice. Editors are on standby when you want a deeper pass.

Fix My Draft

Free welcome credits included. No credit card needed.